2013
DOI: 10.3133/sir20135087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrographic surveys of the Missouri and Yellowstone Rivers at selected bridges and through Bismarck, North Dakota, during the 2011 flood

Abstract: For more information on the USGS-the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS.For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprodTo order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Complex patterns of scour and deposition around these bridges were documented during the flood of 2011 (Densmore et al. ). Although local areas of erosion and deposition mostly differed between the two flows, some areas were similar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Complex patterns of scour and deposition around these bridges were documented during the flood of 2011 (Densmore et al. ). Although local areas of erosion and deposition mostly differed between the two flows, some areas were similar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bathymetry of the river channel was obtained from a hydrographic survey completed June 28–July 8, 2011, using a high‐resolution multibeam echosounder (for details on the hydrographic survey see Densmore et al. ). The hydrographic survey was collected during the flood recession, but shortly after the peak of the flood on June 25, 2011, when daily mean streamflow was 4,390 m 3 /s (Figure ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%