2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrograph peak-shaving using a graph-theoretic algorithm for placement of hydraulic control structures

Abstract: The need to attenuate hydrograph peaks is central to the design of stormwater and flood control systems. However, few guidelines exist for siting hydraulic control structures such that system-scale benefits are maximized. This study presents a graph-theoretic algorithm for stabilizing the hydrologic response of watersheds by placing controllers at strategic locations in the drainage network. This algorithm identifies subcatchments that dominate the peak of the hydrograph, and then finds the "cuts" in the drain… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One solution to reduce the subjectivity is to consider all criteria equally important if the suitable rationale to define the weights of criteria is missing (Wang et al, 2017). Beyond this multicriteria decision-making approach, various theoretical optimization approaches, such as the exhaustive performance-ranking method (Wong and Kerkez, 2018), evolutionary algorithm (Zamani Sabzi et al, 2016), multiple-objective genetic algorithm (Eulogi et al, 2021), and graph theory (Bartos and Kerkez, 2019), are useful methods to support the placement of control points. Future work should explore a more robust optimization solution for sitting control structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One solution to reduce the subjectivity is to consider all criteria equally important if the suitable rationale to define the weights of criteria is missing (Wang et al, 2017). Beyond this multicriteria decision-making approach, various theoretical optimization approaches, such as the exhaustive performance-ranking method (Wong and Kerkez, 2018), evolutionary algorithm (Zamani Sabzi et al, 2016), multiple-objective genetic algorithm (Eulogi et al, 2021), and graph theory (Bartos and Kerkez, 2019), are useful methods to support the placement of control points. Future work should explore a more robust optimization solution for sitting control structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research should also investigate simplified sensor placement algorithms that do not require computing the full Observability Gramian of the system. Sensor placement algorithms based purely on network topology for instance (Bartos & Kerkez, 2019), could provide a scalable alternative to our theoretically motivated approach.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RTC adaptability to watershed alterations such as land-use land-cover (LULC) change and rainfall pattern variation might not be fully exploited due to the unpredicted hydraulic stress, exceptional flood loading, heavy computational expense, and low operating efficiency (Bilodeau et al, 2018). So far, the limitation regarding RTC settings has motivated researchers to develop controller setting optimization algorithms, in order to make most of RTC effectiveness and efficiency in mitigating urban flooding (Bartos et al, 2018;Bartos and Kerkez, 2019;Duchesne et al, 2001;Muschalla et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%