2016
DOI: 10.1007/s13201-016-0469-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogeological modeling for improving groundwater monitoring network and strategies

Abstract: The research aimed to investigate a new approach for spatiotemporal groundwater monitoring network optimization using hydrogeological modeling to improve monitoring strategies. Unmonitored concentrations were incorporated at different potential monitoring locations into the groundwater monitoring optimization method. The proposed method was applied in the contaminated megasite, Bitterfeld/Wolfen, Germany. Based on an existing 3-D geological model, 3-D groundwater flow was obtained from flow velocity simulation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To analyze these complex factors, it is considered effective to conduct a scenario analysis using a hydrological model that represents the water circulation within the alluvial fan. It is generally believed that the spatial distribution of geology and soil properties has a significant influence on hydrological characteristics [27], and 3D groundwater models are often employed for impact assessment (e.g., Thakur [28]; Siena and Riva [29]). However, the Tedori River alluvial fan is composed of relatively uniform sandy gravel deposits.…”
Section: Hydrological Model For Contribution Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To analyze these complex factors, it is considered effective to conduct a scenario analysis using a hydrological model that represents the water circulation within the alluvial fan. It is generally believed that the spatial distribution of geology and soil properties has a significant influence on hydrological characteristics [27], and 3D groundwater models are often employed for impact assessment (e.g., Thakur [28]; Siena and Riva [29]). However, the Tedori River alluvial fan is composed of relatively uniform sandy gravel deposits.…”
Section: Hydrological Model For Contribution Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that the geologic and hydrogeologic characterization approaches can be used for qualitative evaluations of SGD. It also indicates that geologic and hydrogeologic understanding is necessary as a pre-actual SGD estimation study using any of the available methods, as it gives a comprehensive understanding of how the aquifer system operates (Thakur, 2017). In a study evaluating the legacy and drivers of groundwater nutrients and pesticides in an agriculturally impacted coastal Quaternary aquifer system in Southeastern Queensland, Shishaye et al (2021) identified possible preferential flow paths and perched systems by developing 3D geological models (Fig.…”
Section: Hydrogeologic Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the design of a monitoring network is considered a nonlinear and non-convex optimization problem whose optimal criterion measures the useful information contained in the information matrix of the design (Ushijima et al, 2021). GMN optimization approaches are commonly divided into the following three categories based on the techniques applied: (a) those based on hydrogeological conceptual models and hydrogeological expert knowledge, (b) those based on numerical groundwater flow models (Kim and Lee, 2007;Singh and Datta, 2016;Thakur, 2017;Sreekanth et al, 2017), and (c) those based on data analysis with (geo-)statistical techniques. Many studies have focused on the geostatistical ability of kriging frameworks to determine new monitoring wells based on the reduction of estimation variance as the optimization criterion (Nunes et al, 2004;Li et al, 2011;Varouchakis and Hristopulos, 2013;Bhat et al, 2015;Thakur, 2015;Ohmer et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%