2021
DOI: 10.3390/w13060759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogeochemical and Hydrodynamic Assessment of Tirnavos Basin, Central Greece

Abstract: A combined hydrogeochemical and hydrodynamic characterization for the assessment of key aspects related to groundwater resources management was performed in a highly productive agricultural basin of the Thessaly region in central Greece. A complementary suite of tools and methods—including graphical processing, hydrogeochemical modeling, multivariate statistics and environmental isotopes—have been applied to a comprehensive dataset of physicochemical analyses and water level measurements. Results revealed that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
(70 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison to more homogenous karst aquifer, higher degree of heterogeneity in karst hydraulical characteristics results in rapid changes of spring water quality (Fiorillo and Malik 2019). The mainly hydrochemical analyzes of karst groundwater used in the literature (as summarized in Table 1) including: adopting hydrogeochemical diagrams, e.g., Piper trilinear, Durov and Gibbs (Ghobadi et al 2018;Gao et al 2020;Davraz and Batur 2021;Hoaghia et al 2021); development of hydrochemical indices, e,g., chloro-alkaline and saturation index (Ndoye et al 2018;Hussien et al 2016;Hwang et al 2017Sako et al 2020; statistical methods, e.g., principle factor analysis, cross-correlation analysis, and principal component analysis (Ndoye et al 2018;Sako et al 2020;Vrouhakis et al 2021); and stable isotope analysis (Ghobadi et al 2018;Tang et al 2021). It can be noted that aside from hydrograph and chemograph analysis which usually requires only spring discharge and hydrochemical time-series data, other methods including detailed site-specific speleological investigation (Ford and Williams 2007), tracer tests (Goldscheider and Neukum 2010), hydrograph analysis (Fiorillo 2014) and model ensembles (Fandel et al 2020) are either expensive to implement, time-consuming or require more data input.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison to more homogenous karst aquifer, higher degree of heterogeneity in karst hydraulical characteristics results in rapid changes of spring water quality (Fiorillo and Malik 2019). The mainly hydrochemical analyzes of karst groundwater used in the literature (as summarized in Table 1) including: adopting hydrogeochemical diagrams, e.g., Piper trilinear, Durov and Gibbs (Ghobadi et al 2018;Gao et al 2020;Davraz and Batur 2021;Hoaghia et al 2021); development of hydrochemical indices, e,g., chloro-alkaline and saturation index (Ndoye et al 2018;Hussien et al 2016;Hwang et al 2017Sako et al 2020; statistical methods, e.g., principle factor analysis, cross-correlation analysis, and principal component analysis (Ndoye et al 2018;Sako et al 2020;Vrouhakis et al 2021); and stable isotope analysis (Ghobadi et al 2018;Tang et al 2021). It can be noted that aside from hydrograph and chemograph analysis which usually requires only spring discharge and hydrochemical time-series data, other methods including detailed site-specific speleological investigation (Ford and Williams 2007), tracer tests (Goldscheider and Neukum 2010), hydrograph analysis (Fiorillo 2014) and model ensembles (Fandel et al 2020) are either expensive to implement, time-consuming or require more data input.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%