2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2005.01044.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogen Sulphide Headache and Other Rare, Global Headaches

Abstract: One aim of the Vågå study of headache epidemiology was to depict the total panorama of headaches in a small-sized, Norwegian community at the end of the 20th century. In the present part of the study, a search was made for the rare, global headaches. Various, relatively unknown headache categories were observed, such as hydrogen sulphide intoxication (n = 2) after exposure to H(2)S ambient air concentrations of >or=100 p.p.m. In Vågå, nitroglycerine headache ('dynamite headache') proved to be a relatively freq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bilateral ones contained relatively unknown headaches like "headache after moderate H 2S exposure", which has been dealt with elsewhere [33]. Herein, unilateral headaches, including relatively unknown ones, have been dealt with.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bilateral ones contained relatively unknown headaches like "headache after moderate H 2S exposure", which has been dealt with elsewhere [33]. Herein, unilateral headaches, including relatively unknown ones, have been dealt with.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of ice‐induced headache (IIH) is quite variable (7.6%–93%) . In adult populations, it was observed that 8% of those interviewed reported already having had headache induced by cold stimulus; other studies reported 15%, 37%, and 60% . In teenage populations, the prevalence range was from 41% to 79% …”
Section: Cold Stimulus Headachementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of being of frequent occurrence, there are few studies on HICS (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10) and none of them has ratified the more recent International Classification of Headache Disorders 2nd Edition (ICHD II-2004) diagnostic criteria (2). They have apparently never been validated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%