2000
DOI: 10.13031/2013.3017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogen Sulfide Production From Stored Liquid Swine Manure: A Laboratory Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also reported that due to the ''reservoir-effect'' of liquid manure H 2 S was held for about 10 days before H 2 S bubble started to release, which can explain the slow release of H 2 S with storage time. Although the pattern of H 2 S emissions in this study was similar to that of swine manure reported by Hobbs et al [3] and Blanes-Vidal et al [4], H 2 S concentration from farm A was about fivefold of that from swine manure during a 10-day experiment of Arogo et al [21]. In their study, negligible H 2 S emissions were observed after 10 days of storage, whereas a very high concentration of H 2 S was still observed from dairy manure.…”
Section: Effects Of Storage Time On Hydrogen Sulphide Emissionssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They also reported that due to the ''reservoir-effect'' of liquid manure H 2 S was held for about 10 days before H 2 S bubble started to release, which can explain the slow release of H 2 S with storage time. Although the pattern of H 2 S emissions in this study was similar to that of swine manure reported by Hobbs et al [3] and Blanes-Vidal et al [4], H 2 S concentration from farm A was about fivefold of that from swine manure during a 10-day experiment of Arogo et al [21]. In their study, negligible H 2 S emissions were observed after 10 days of storage, whereas a very high concentration of H 2 S was still observed from dairy manure.…”
Section: Effects Of Storage Time On Hydrogen Sulphide Emissionssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The change of H 2 S in farm A is more significant than in farm B. In farm A, exponential H 2 S emissions were observed from day 2 to day 4 (1172 % increase), which was related to the readily available sulphide in manure [16,21] and the full development of the sulphate-reducing bacteria [20]. From day 4 to day 21, the average H 2 S concentration recorded was 5.4 mg/L.…”
Section: Effects Of Storage Time On Hydrogen Sulphide Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the oxygen-rich environment of the aerobic reactor, ammonia likely became nitrified by ammonia-oxidizing bacteria of the genus Nitrosomonas, whose 16S rRNA gene sequences were only observed in the aerobic treatment system (data not shown). When the oxidized nitrogen species entered the anoxic conditions of the storage tank, they were (3,5,6) and, to a lesser extent, by assimilation. At the phylum level, the feed material-derived 16S rRNA gene library was very similar to a library constructed from dairy waste reported previously (26).…”
Section: Vol 73 2007mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the fatty acids, especially the higher content of linoleic acid in the soybean oil and chicken fat (35 and 20%) than the tallow and lard (2% and 11%) can impact on the pancreatic enzyme which can shaped the utilization, fermentation in the GIT and excretion of nutrients, and finally the emission of gases (Evans et al, 2002;Hiraoka et al, 2003;Beccaccia et al, 2015). Hydrogen sulfide is the most prominent volatile sulfur generated by bacterial sulfate reduction and decomposition of sulfur-containing organic compounds under anaerobic conditions (Arogo et al, 2000). Lower efficiency of nutrients utilization causes excretion of unutilized nutrients through the urine and feces, which then undergoes anaerobic microbial decomposition, resulting in generation of odorous compounds (volatile amines and sulfurs, phenols, volatile fatty acids and indoles (Gilley et al, 2000).…”
Section: Excreta Noxious Gas Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%