All Days 1979
DOI: 10.2118/7854-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogen Sulfide In The Drilling Industry

Abstract: Carter, D.R., and Adams, N.J., Prentice and Records Enterprises, Inc. Prentice and Records Enterprises, Inc. Copyright 1979, American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, Inc. Petroleum Engineers, Inc. This paper was presented at the 1979 Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME Deep Drilling and Production Symposium held in Amarillo, Texas, April 1–3, 1979. The material is subject to correction by the author. Permission to copy is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower pH of SourScav compared to the higher pH of both triazine and MEA is attributed to the significant pH change induced by the scavengers. Generally, the practical pH range of water-based drilling muds is in the range of 9.0–11.0; however, increasing the mud pH value above this range is a recommended practice to limit the H 2 S effects, and the regulations set pH level of 10 to be always maintained as a minimum in a sour environment . Accordingly, the pH resulting from the use of the MEA complies with the regulations and recommendations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The lower pH of SourScav compared to the higher pH of both triazine and MEA is attributed to the significant pH change induced by the scavengers. Generally, the practical pH range of water-based drilling muds is in the range of 9.0–11.0; however, increasing the mud pH value above this range is a recommended practice to limit the H 2 S effects, and the regulations set pH level of 10 to be always maintained as a minimum in a sour environment . Accordingly, the pH resulting from the use of the MEA complies with the regulations and recommendations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In general, the pH range for aqueous muds is typically between 9.0 and 11.0, while in the presence of H 2 S, it is recommended to maintain a higher pH level in order to lessen its acidifying effect . Also, the regulations for drilling in sour environments mandate a minimum pH level of 10 . Based on these requirements, the pH achieved by the MnO-containing fluid is in compliance with these regulations, while using SourScav raises a concern and necessitates more consideration for alkalinity control.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 13 Also, the regulations for drilling in sour environments mandate a minimum pH level of 10. 50 Based on these requirements, the pH achieved by the MnO-containing fluid is in compliance with these regulations, while using SourScav raises a concern and necessitates more consideration for alkalinity control.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the addition of 1, 2, and 3 g steelmaking waste to the base mud reduced its pH to 10.4, 9.8, and 8.5, respectively. In general, the acceptable pH range of water-based drilling fluids is in the range 9.0-11.0; yet, maintaining a pH value greater than 10 is required when drilling H 2 S-bearing formations [84]. As a result, the pH of SWM1 passes the pH criterion, SWM2 is near to the threshold limit of 10, and SWM3 is less than this limit.…”
Section: Ph Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%