2004
DOI: 10.1252/jcej.37.286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogen Production by Steam Reforming of Methanol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
19
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with previous studies on PdZn formation 8,[12][13][14] , the present electron microscopy study unambiguously reveals the onset of the formation of a tetragonal PdZn phase upon reduction at T ≥ 473 K. The formation of the alloy phase proceeds most likely via topotactic formation of PdZn on top of the Pd particles. This growth mechanism is probably favoured by the relatively small mismatch of the lattice constants of fcc Pd (0.388 nm) and tetragonal PdZn (0.410 nm).…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…In line with previous studies on PdZn formation 8,[12][13][14] , the present electron microscopy study unambiguously reveals the onset of the formation of a tetragonal PdZn phase upon reduction at T ≥ 473 K. The formation of the alloy phase proceeds most likely via topotactic formation of PdZn on top of the Pd particles. This growth mechanism is probably favoured by the relatively small mismatch of the lattice constants of fcc Pd (0.388 nm) and tetragonal PdZn (0.410 nm).…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The TOF was estimated to be 0.39 s -1 , which is comparable to the value of 0.8 s -1 reported in the literature for Pd/ZnO catalysts [25]. As a comparison, the TOF for Cu/ZnO/Al 2 O 3 catalysts reported in the literature has been reported to range from 0.0152 s -1 [26] to 0.11 s -1 [27]. After Table 2: Reactivity comparison of two catalysts exposed to different pretreatments prior to steam reforming conditions The TOF was estimated to be 0.39 s -1 , which is comparable to the value of 0.8 s -1 reported in the literature for Pd/ZnO catalysts [25].…”
Section: Ftir Of Absorbed Cosupporting
confidence: 79%
“…After Table 2: Reactivity comparison of two catalysts exposed to different pretreatments prior to steam reforming conditions The TOF was estimated to be 0.39 s -1 , which is comparable to the value of 0.8 s -1 reported in the literature for Pd/ZnO catalysts [25]. As a comparison, the TOF for Cu/ZnO/Al 2 O 3 catalysts reported in the literature has been reported to range from 0.0152 s -1 [26] to 0.11 s -1 [27]. After 4 hours of exposure to steam reforming conditions, both these catalysts were analyzed via FTIR of adsorbed CO. Figure 8 shows that the surfaces of the two catalysts give nearly identical IR spectra after reaction.…”
Section: Ftir Of Absorbed Cosupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The need for only a preferential oxidation of CO (PROX) process for gas purification prior to supply to a fuel cell makes this system suitable for the realization of small reformer requiring a simple system. Cu/ZnO catalysts have been studied for use in methanol synthesis, water gas shift reaction, and methanol steam reforming 5) 13) . However, there were few reports on the development of the catalyst for low-temperature hydrogen production as required for miniaturized methanol reformers, and the applicability as a power source for portable electronic devices had yet to be discussed in the early 2000's when the authors started the research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%