2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogen production by co-cultures of Lactobacillus and a photosynthetic bacterium, Rhodobacter sphaeroides RV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
25
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples include bio-hydrogen production by the photosynthetic non-sulfur bacteria (PNSB) which eventually convert solar energy to usable hydrogen fuels (McKinlay and Harwood 2010 ;Argun and Kargi 2011 ;Basak and Das 2007 ;Yokoi et al 2002 ;Asada et al 2006 ) , application of anaerobic sulfate reduction to remove heavy metal contamination (Muyzer and Stams 2008 ) and anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) to promote the global nitrogen cycle (van der Star et al 2007 ) , as well as the recent exploitation of hypoxia targeted bacterial strains Salmonella , Clostridium , and Bi fi dobacterium for cancer treatment (Arrach et al 2008 ;Forbes 2010 ;Ryan et al 2009 ) . While designing and manipulation of these systems must ful fi ll the fundamental principles of energy and redox homeostasis of bacterial physiology, optimizing various environmental, process, and strain based factors can be explicitly determined by experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include bio-hydrogen production by the photosynthetic non-sulfur bacteria (PNSB) which eventually convert solar energy to usable hydrogen fuels (McKinlay and Harwood 2010 ;Argun and Kargi 2011 ;Basak and Das 2007 ;Yokoi et al 2002 ;Asada et al 2006 ) , application of anaerobic sulfate reduction to remove heavy metal contamination (Muyzer and Stams 2008 ) and anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) to promote the global nitrogen cycle (van der Star et al 2007 ) , as well as the recent exploitation of hypoxia targeted bacterial strains Salmonella , Clostridium , and Bi fi dobacterium for cancer treatment (Arrach et al 2008 ;Forbes 2010 ;Ryan et al 2009 ) . While designing and manipulation of these systems must ful fi ll the fundamental principles of energy and redox homeostasis of bacterial physiology, optimizing various environmental, process, and strain based factors can be explicitly determined by experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this calculation was based on a H 2 yield of 1.3 mol H 2 /mol hexose from a single-stage bacterial fermentation. Several authors report multiorganism systems for H 2 production producing in excess of 7 mol H 2 /mol hexose (Weetall et al 1989;Miura et al 1992;Ike et al 2001;Kawaguchi et al 2001;Yokoi et al 2001;Asada et al 2006;Kim et al 2006c). Hence, a bio-H 2 process could be more energetically productive than a bio-methane process if dual H 2 -producing systems could be implemented.…”
Section: Bio-h 2 Bio-methane or Bio-ethanol?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been a number of recent reports on two-stage systems as shown in Fig. 4 [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. One study successfully produced hydrogen using olive mill wastewater for the production of biohydrogen in a two-stage process, with a three fold increase in hydrogen production when compared to photo-fermentation alone, and a COD conversion effi ciency of ~55% [29].…”
Section: Microbial Processes Producing Hydrogenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been several studies in which co-cultures of fermentative and photosynthetic organisms were examined [26,33]. Work with co-cultures of both C. butyricum and R. sphaeroides showed only a slight increase in the hydrogen yield when compared with production obtained from pure cultures separately [26]; even at high Rhodobacter ratios (~6:1) it appeared that R. sphaeroides was not able to compete with Clostridium for substrate (glucose).…”
Section: Microbial Processes Producing Hydrogenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation