Abstract:Prions are highly resistant to physical or chemical damage, although previous studies have shown that STERRAD®, a hydrogen gas plasma sterilizer using radiofrequency (RF) discharge, has an inactivation effect. Here, the effect of hydrogen peroxide gas combined with dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma and corona discharge plasma using a RENO-S130 sterilizer on scrapie prions was examined. Scrapie prion-infected mouse brain homogenate was air-dried on a cover glass, sealed in a Tyvek pouch, and subjected t… Show more
“…Survival rates of animals were 83% (both non-lumen and Eco mode) after injection with plasma-treated prions. Survival of untreated controls was 0% [ 65 ] RF: radio frequency; DBD: dielectric barrier discharge. …”
Section: Prion Inactivation Using Hydrogen Peroxide Gas Plasmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, STERRAD ® generates plasma using RF discharge. Recently, the authors examined other hydrogen peroxide gas plasma instruments to evaluate prion inactivation [ 65 ]. RENO-S130 (Renosem Co., Ltd., Bucheon-si, Korea) utilizes hydrogen peroxide gas plasma similar to STERRAD ® but does not use RF plasma [ 66 ].…”
Section: Prion Inactivation Using Hydrogen Peroxide Gas Plasmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors succeeded in prion inactivation using hydrogen peroxide gas plasma and RENO-S130 against scrapie prions [ 65 ]. RENO-S130 is composed of a DBD plasma region for sterilization and a corona plasma region for the removal of residual hydrogen peroxide.…”
Section: Prion Inactivation Using Hydrogen Peroxide Gas Plasmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a mouse bioassay showed that treatment of prions with RENO-S130 (both non-lumen and Eco modes) increased the survival rates of mice ( Table 2 ) and prolonged mouse survival time ( Table 3 ). Significant differences in survival curves analyzed using log-rank tests were observed between the RENO-S130 (non-lumen or Eco mode)-treated and untreated groups in the mouse bioassay [ 65 ]. Results of protein misfolding cyclic amplification (PMCA) also supported the evidence of prion inactivation using the non-lumen or Eco mode RENO-S130 treatment.…”
Section: Prion Inactivation Using Hydrogen Peroxide Gas Plasmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sterilization activity of RENO-S130 appears to be related to the co-generation of chemicals other than hydrogen peroxide gas. Ozone generated by DBD plasma enters the sterilization chamber region, and 10–50 ppm of ozone gas was detected using an ozone analyzer UV-100 (Eco Sensors Division of KWJ Engineering Inc., Santa Fe, NM, USA) in the RENO-S130 sterilization chamber box during operation [ 65 ]. Ozone synergistically enhances the prion inactivation efficiency of hydrogen peroxide gas [ 67 ].…”
Section: Prion Inactivation Using Hydrogen Peroxide Gas Plasmamentioning
Prions, which cause transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs), are a notorious group of infectious agents with possibly the highest resistance to complete inactivation. Although various gas plasma instruments have been developed, studies on prion inactivation using gas plasma instruments are limited. Among them, the hydrogen peroxide gas plasma instrument, STERRAD® (Advanced Sterilization Products; ASP, Johnson & Johnson, Irvine, CA, USA), is recommended for prion inactivation of heat-sensitive medical devices. However, STERRAD® is not a plasma sterilizer but a hydrogen peroxide gas sterilizer. In STERRAD®, plasma generated by radio frequency (RF) discharge removes excess hydrogen peroxide gas and does not contribute to sterilization. This is also supported by evidence that the instrument was not affected by the presence or absence of RF gas plasma. However, recent studies have shown that other gas plasma instruments derived from air, nitrogen, oxygen, Ar, and a mixture of gases using corona, dielectric barrier, microwave, and pulse discharges can inactivate scrapie prions. As inactivation studies on prions other than scrapie are limited, further accumulation of evidence on the effectiveness of gas plasma using human-derived prion samples is warranted for practical purposes.
“…Survival rates of animals were 83% (both non-lumen and Eco mode) after injection with plasma-treated prions. Survival of untreated controls was 0% [ 65 ] RF: radio frequency; DBD: dielectric barrier discharge. …”
Section: Prion Inactivation Using Hydrogen Peroxide Gas Plasmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, STERRAD ® generates plasma using RF discharge. Recently, the authors examined other hydrogen peroxide gas plasma instruments to evaluate prion inactivation [ 65 ]. RENO-S130 (Renosem Co., Ltd., Bucheon-si, Korea) utilizes hydrogen peroxide gas plasma similar to STERRAD ® but does not use RF plasma [ 66 ].…”
Section: Prion Inactivation Using Hydrogen Peroxide Gas Plasmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors succeeded in prion inactivation using hydrogen peroxide gas plasma and RENO-S130 against scrapie prions [ 65 ]. RENO-S130 is composed of a DBD plasma region for sterilization and a corona plasma region for the removal of residual hydrogen peroxide.…”
Section: Prion Inactivation Using Hydrogen Peroxide Gas Plasmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a mouse bioassay showed that treatment of prions with RENO-S130 (both non-lumen and Eco modes) increased the survival rates of mice ( Table 2 ) and prolonged mouse survival time ( Table 3 ). Significant differences in survival curves analyzed using log-rank tests were observed between the RENO-S130 (non-lumen or Eco mode)-treated and untreated groups in the mouse bioassay [ 65 ]. Results of protein misfolding cyclic amplification (PMCA) also supported the evidence of prion inactivation using the non-lumen or Eco mode RENO-S130 treatment.…”
Section: Prion Inactivation Using Hydrogen Peroxide Gas Plasmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sterilization activity of RENO-S130 appears to be related to the co-generation of chemicals other than hydrogen peroxide gas. Ozone generated by DBD plasma enters the sterilization chamber region, and 10–50 ppm of ozone gas was detected using an ozone analyzer UV-100 (Eco Sensors Division of KWJ Engineering Inc., Santa Fe, NM, USA) in the RENO-S130 sterilization chamber box during operation [ 65 ]. Ozone synergistically enhances the prion inactivation efficiency of hydrogen peroxide gas [ 67 ].…”
Section: Prion Inactivation Using Hydrogen Peroxide Gas Plasmamentioning
Prions, which cause transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs), are a notorious group of infectious agents with possibly the highest resistance to complete inactivation. Although various gas plasma instruments have been developed, studies on prion inactivation using gas plasma instruments are limited. Among them, the hydrogen peroxide gas plasma instrument, STERRAD® (Advanced Sterilization Products; ASP, Johnson & Johnson, Irvine, CA, USA), is recommended for prion inactivation of heat-sensitive medical devices. However, STERRAD® is not a plasma sterilizer but a hydrogen peroxide gas sterilizer. In STERRAD®, plasma generated by radio frequency (RF) discharge removes excess hydrogen peroxide gas and does not contribute to sterilization. This is also supported by evidence that the instrument was not affected by the presence or absence of RF gas plasma. However, recent studies have shown that other gas plasma instruments derived from air, nitrogen, oxygen, Ar, and a mixture of gases using corona, dielectric barrier, microwave, and pulse discharges can inactivate scrapie prions. As inactivation studies on prions other than scrapie are limited, further accumulation of evidence on the effectiveness of gas plasma using human-derived prion samples is warranted for practical purposes.
Background:
Lidocaine injection with 2% HCl as an anesthetic drug must guarantee its sterility to avoid microbial contamination. In efforts to maintain the sterile preparation of Lidocaine HCl 2% before use in hospitals, some anesthesiologists opt for re-sterilization.
Objective:
This study aimed to evaluate the impact of plasma sterilization using hydrogen peroxide on Lidocaine HCl levels employing a validated Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography (UPLC) assay.
Methods:
The 2% Lidocaine HCl samples were separated into two groups, one undergoing re-sterilization with hydrogen peroxide and the other handled only with aseptic techniques. The chromatographic assay was performed using a Waters Corp Acquity UPLC® H-Class system and a Waters Corp Acquity UPLC® BEH C18 column, with a mobile phase of 20% Acetonitrile and 80% Acetate Buffer pH 3.4, flow rate of 0.3 mL/min, and total duration of 4.5 minutes.
Results:
The results showed a decrease in Lidocaine HCl levels to 1.88% after re-sterilization and 2.01% without re-sterilization.
Conclusion:
These findings suggest that re-sterilization with hydrogen peroxide plasma sterilization leads to a significant decrease in Lidocaine HCl levels, causing non-compliance with pharmacopoeia standards.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.