2020
DOI: 10.1002/qute.202000082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogen‐Intercalated Graphene on SiC as Platform for Hybrid Superconductor Devices

Abstract: Nanodevices based on hybrid graphene-superconductor structures have recently attracted much attention owing to both fundamental and application aspects. However, atomic-level investigations of proximity-induced superconductivity in graphene, especially on technologically relevant substrates remain rare. Here, the atomic-scale study of electronic properties and the superconducting proximity effect in hydrogen-intercalated single-layer graphene on SiC decorated with epitaxial lead (Pb) islands is reported. The g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the values of Δ G , obtained from dI/dV spectra close to the islands, varies strongly for different Pb‐graphene junctions, ranging from Δ G = 1.2 meV, very close to bulk Pb ( Δ Pb = 1.35 meV), to Δ G = 0.6 meV. These Δ G values are all significantly larger than the proximity‐induced gaps by Pb islands on hydrogen‐intercalated single‐layer graphene on SiC(0001), where values around Δ G = 0.2 meV have been reported, [18] indicating that in the present case the Pb‐graphene interface has a larger transparency. The typical values employed in our fits for the broadening or Dynes’ parameter Γ G are on the order of 0.1 Δ Pb , which are quite standard for strong‐coupling superconductors like Pb [17] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, the values of Δ G , obtained from dI/dV spectra close to the islands, varies strongly for different Pb‐graphene junctions, ranging from Δ G = 1.2 meV, very close to bulk Pb ( Δ Pb = 1.35 meV), to Δ G = 0.6 meV. These Δ G values are all significantly larger than the proximity‐induced gaps by Pb islands on hydrogen‐intercalated single‐layer graphene on SiC(0001), where values around Δ G = 0.2 meV have been reported, [18] indicating that in the present case the Pb‐graphene interface has a larger transparency. The typical values employed in our fits for the broadening or Dynes’ parameter Γ G are on the order of 0.1 Δ Pb , which are quite standard for strong‐coupling superconductors like Pb [17] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In all these systems room‐temperature evaporation of Pb resulted in the formation of triangular Pb islands, similar to those shown on graphene on SiC(000‐1) (refer to Figures S1 and S2, Supporting Information and refs. [18,30,35). Our results on these surfaces reveal that in all cases bulk‐like superconductivity persists in Pb islands, inducing superconducting properties to the surrounding graphene regions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On this graphene surface, we deposit 5-15 monolayers (ML) of Pb at a rate of 3-10 ML min −1 while maintaining the sample at room temperature. [34,35] As a result, several triangular Pb islands with heights between 2 and 10 nm and sides between 20 and 300 nm are formed, see Figure 1a.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, proximity spin-orbit coupling has been induced in Pb-intercalated graphene, yet only on metallic Ir and Pt substrates [30][31][32]. On the other hand, proximity superconductivity has been reported in quasi-freestanding monolayer graphene on SiC decorated with Pb islands [33,34]. Regarding the very limited extent of this lateral proximity effect into graphene, the homogeneous intercalation of Pb underneath could be a pragmatic workaround as it might even give rise to vertical proximity coupling that spreads over the entire layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%