2022
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.2c02885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogen-Evolution Allylic C(sp3)–H Alkylation with Protic C(sp3)–H Bonds via Triplet Synergistic Brønsted Base/Cobalt/Photoredox Catalysis

Abstract: Transition-metal-catalyzed allylic C­(sp3)–H alkylation with carbon-center nucleophiles is a straightforward approach to C­(sp3)–C­(sp3) bond formation, which has found widespread application in organic synthesis. However, stoichiometric oxidants are typically required to realize the transformation. Herein, by the triplet synergistic merger of Brønsted base/cobalt/photoredox catalysis, a mild protocol for the hydrogen-evolution allylic C­(sp3)–H alkylation with protic C­(sp3)–H feedstocks was developed in an o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(100 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S12†) 22 has a higher oxidation potential than the base-activated diethyl malonate 2a ( E p/2 = 0.83 V vs. SCE, Fig. S10 and S11†), 32,49 thus it is unlikely that 1a undergoes a preferential oxidation followed by the nucleophilic addition of 2a to the resulting alkene radical cation. 50…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…S12†) 22 has a higher oxidation potential than the base-activated diethyl malonate 2a ( E p/2 = 0.83 V vs. SCE, Fig. S10 and S11†), 32,49 thus it is unlikely that 1a undergoes a preferential oxidation followed by the nucleophilic addition of 2a to the resulting alkene radical cation. 50…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S12 †) 22 has a higher oxidation potential than the base-activated diethyl malonate 2a (E p/2 = 0.83 V vs. SCE, Fig. S10 and S11 †), 32,49 thus it is unlikely that 1a undergoes a preferential oxidation followed by the nucleophilic addition of 2a to the resulting alkene radical cation. 50 The excited-state reduction potential of Ir( ppy) 3 is only 0.31 V vs. SCE (see the ESI †), 51 thus precluding a proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) from diethyl malonate 2a to excited a Reaction conditions: alkene substrate (0.3 mmol), 2a (0.9 mmol), K 2 CO 3 (0.03 mmol), Ir(ppy) 3 (0.009 mmol), Bu 4 NPF 6 (0.45 mmol), acetone/TFE (11 : 1, v/v, 6.0 mL), 6 W blue LEDs (λ max = 455 nm), CC anode (15 × 15 mm), platinum plate cathode (15 × 15 mm), undivided cell, 1.5 mA, Ar, room temperature, 12 h. b 24 h. c 0.15 mmol of K 2 CO 3 were used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Just prior to their publication on the three-component carboarylation of alkenes with C(sp 3 )À H acid feedstocks, the Deng group also detailed the oxidative allylation of the same feedstock chemicals using a triple catalytic system (Scheme 32A). [69] The oxidative allylation operates under the synergistic catalysis of Ru(bpy) 3 Cl 2 • 6H 2 O, Co(dmH) 2 PyCl (165), and cesium carbonate. The multicatalytic platform operates on carbon C(sp 3 )À H acids in the presence of 1,1-disubstituted alkenes under blue light LED irradiation in acetonitrile.…”
Section: Proton Transfer/electron Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Recently, Deng and co-workers reported an unprecedented catalytic system for the direct allylic C(sp 3 )–H alkylation of a wide range of branched α-alkenes with diverse protic C(sp 3 )–H feedstocks (Scheme 1a, bottom). 5 Additionally, the sulfur-mediated allylic C–H alkylation of tri- and disubstituted olefins via allylic sulfonium intermediates is also an efficient protocol (Scheme 1b). 6 However, all the above-mentioned approaches offer limited access to allylated carbon quaternary centers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%