1978
DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(78)90005-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogen diffusion in palladium by galvanostatic charging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(4) depend on the initial and surface conditions, leading to a series of diffusion models. Concentration of H 2 or D 2 in our samples during UV-irradiation (i.e., when a constant flux F i is established at the irradiated surface (x = 0) of a sample of thickness l, the initial H 2 or D 2 concentration is zero throughout the sample, and concentration at x = l is C(l, t) = 0 at all times) is modeled by the following equation (Early 1978):…”
Section: Theoretical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) depend on the initial and surface conditions, leading to a series of diffusion models. Concentration of H 2 or D 2 in our samples during UV-irradiation (i.e., when a constant flux F i is established at the irradiated surface (x = 0) of a sample of thickness l, the initial H 2 or D 2 concentration is zero throughout the sample, and concentration at x = l is C(l, t) = 0 at all times) is modeled by the following equation (Early 1978):…”
Section: Theoretical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…i~ = toe ~2~ [4] DF J~ = L-Co [5] where j| is the steady-state permeation current density, ~q is the overpotential, a = F/RT, Co is the hydrogen concentration directly beneath the cathode surface, C, is the saturation value of Co, ~ is the transfer coefficient of reaction 1, ~2 is the transfer coefficient of reaction 2, ic is the cathodic current density, D is the hydrogen diffusion coefficient, and L is the membrane thickness. Bockris et aI.…”
Section: J~=f[kl(1-~)e ~-K 1coe (1-~l)an] [3]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,15 The first variation, referred to as the potentiostatic charging, is based on the assumption that a constant potential at the entry surface would immediately establish a constant hydrogen concentration in the meta) fust below the entry side. In the second variation, galvanostatic charging, It is assumed that a constant cathodic current on the entry side produces a constant hydrogen flux.…”
Section: Hydrogen Diffusivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, suitable linear relationships similar to equation (2) are [17][18][19] : log(ip1 " -i P )t' 12 vs 1/t for decay and log(i p -i pl s)t vs 1/t for build up, where i p ,¢ is the initial steady-state permeation rate at a chosen cathodic current density before its change, and i, is the actual permeation rate at a chosen time after applying a new cathodic current density. The stopes of these relationships, expressed as in Equation (2) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] .from these transients are given in Figure 9. The obtained relationships are linear and close to one another.…”
Section: Hydrogen Diffusivitymentioning
confidence: 99%