“…The main problem for the characterization of these dynamic phenomena is precisely their great diversity. , There are the formally simplest examples where two nonequivalent hydride ligands exchange their positions, like [OsH 2 (CO)(NO)(PR 3 ) 2 ] + , Re(CO)H 2 (PR 3 ) 2 (NO), and MH 2 (PR 3 ) 4 (M = Fe, Ru). , There are cases where the hydride ligand exchanges with another hydrogen atom not originally attached to the metal, being it from a thiol group of another ligand in [IrH 2 (HS(CH 2 ) 3 SH)(PCy 3 ) 2 ] + , or an acidic proton present in the solvent in [HM(CO) 4 L] - (M = Cr, Mo, W; L = CO, PR 3 ) and Re(CO)H 2 (NO)L 2 , these latter processes going very likely through weakly bound complex−solvent species. There is finally the wealth of exchange processes associated with bridging hydrogen atoms, especially with BH 4 and derivatives ((C 5 H 5 ) 2 V(BH 4 ),18a (C 5 H 5 ) 2 Ta(PMe 3 )(H 3 BSi( t Bu) 2 H),18b [Mo(CO) 4 (BH 4 )] - ,18c (C 5 H 5 )ZrH(BH 4 ), OsH 3 (BH 4 )(P(c-C 5 H 9 ) 3 ) 2 20 ), but not limited to them (RhH((μH)SnR 3 ) 2 (PPh 3 ) 2 21 ).…”