2006
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-4853-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogen Bonding—New Insights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 503 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Atomic polarization and charge transfer as well as dispersion and exchange effect must be considered. Various aspects of the nature of hydrogen bonds are described in detail elsewhere. Rephrasing the provisions of the previous paragraph, we can assert that the electron population within the space gap between neighboring ρ- and φ k -basins is a measure of covalency for any polar interaction. Armed with this yardstick, we are now in a position to get a reasonable answer to the question posed by the title of the review article, “What Is the Covalency of Hydrogen Bonding?”, by Grabowski …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Atomic polarization and charge transfer as well as dispersion and exchange effect must be considered. Various aspects of the nature of hydrogen bonds are described in detail elsewhere. Rephrasing the provisions of the previous paragraph, we can assert that the electron population within the space gap between neighboring ρ- and φ k -basins is a measure of covalency for any polar interaction. Armed with this yardstick, we are now in a position to get a reasonable answer to the question posed by the title of the review article, “What Is the Covalency of Hydrogen Bonding?”, by Grabowski …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…With its clearly constructed formalism through which to identify an atom's boundary, QTAIM brings clarity and consistency to a number of previously ill defined chemical concepts such as the energies, sizes and electron counts of the atoms comprising a molecule or solid. However, the topological representation of chemical bonding ensuing from this theory is plagued by an ongoing debate-both questioning [6,[29][30][31][32] and supporting [33][34][35][36][37][38] its rigor and utility. It should be noted however, that the topological approach to bond analysis due to QTAIM neglects the central attribute of the theory-the partitioning of charge density into regions with well-characterized energies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), while previous reports gave positive value (about 0.002 a.u.). [31,65,66] Though in either case its magnitude is small and satisfies the H-bonding criterion of |H c |, [31,67] the sign-changing of implies the inconsistence in classifying the H-bonding into partiallycovalent and noncovalent interaction strictly according to criteria introduced above. This discrepancy might be mainly attributed to different sizes of basis sets in producing the electron density.…”
Section: Zpv Fluctuation Of Electronic-structure Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%