1988
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.540090602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogen bonding in MM2

Abstract: Hydrogen bonding is qualitatively accounted for in the early versions of the MM2 program, but not quantitatively. Experimentally, the hydrogen bonds are somewhat shorter and stronger than calculated by MM2. This has been corrected now in MM2(87), by reducing the van der Waals radius of the hydrogen involved in hydrogen bonding for that interaction only, and by increasing the van der Waals' attraction between the hydrogen and the various electronegative atoms to which it can hydrogen bond by about 1-3 kcal/mol,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Parametrization of this force field allows the investigation of hydrogen bonding by reducing the van der Waals radius of hydrogen atoms attached to electronegative atoms to 0.05 nm when such a hydrogen interacts with a hydrogen acceptor atom; the well depth is increased to 1.0 kcal/mol. These parameters guarantee similar potential functions as those used lie Estelberger et al /FEBS Letters 357 (1995) [37][38][39][40] in the well-known MM2 force field [15]. Moreover, comparison with ab initio quantum chemical calculations has shown that the molecular mechanical technique described yields results which are excellently comparable with those of the much more sophisticated ab initio approach (Reibnegger et al, submitted).…”
Section: Systematic Generation Of Reasonable Geometries Jorsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Parametrization of this force field allows the investigation of hydrogen bonding by reducing the van der Waals radius of hydrogen atoms attached to electronegative atoms to 0.05 nm when such a hydrogen interacts with a hydrogen acceptor atom; the well depth is increased to 1.0 kcal/mol. These parameters guarantee similar potential functions as those used lie Estelberger et al /FEBS Letters 357 (1995) [37][38][39][40] in the well-known MM2 force field [15]. Moreover, comparison with ab initio quantum chemical calculations has shown that the molecular mechanical technique described yields results which are excellently comparable with those of the much more sophisticated ab initio approach (Reibnegger et al, submitted).…”
Section: Systematic Generation Of Reasonable Geometries Jorsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The RAMM program is especially suitable to detect local minima of higher energy than those which are normally adopted in a molecular dynamics run (19). The force field and energy functions used in RAMM correspond to the Allinger molecular mechanics method MM2-87 (20,21).…”
Section: Preparation Of the Ligand A Mixture Of 1-o-[3ј-(trifluoroacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have made a comparison of calculated conformational properties employing four different molecular mechanics methods, MM2(85), [4][5][6][7][8] fluoro subsituted test compounds. Optimization was done by using the ChemX default optimizer algorithm and the convergence criterion for the minimization was set to 0.0001 kcal/mol.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%