2015
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.5b08559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogen-Bonded Complexes of Phenylacetylene–Acetylene: Who is the Proton Donor?

Abstract: Hydrogen-bonded complexes of C2H2 and phenylacetylene (PhAc) were studied using matrix isolation infrared spectroscopy and quantum chemical computations. Both C2H2 and PhAc, being potential proton donors, the question arises as to which of the two species would be the proton donor in the PhAc-C2H2 complex; a question that this work primarily addresses. The molecular structures, vibrational frequencies, and interaction energies of the PhAc-C2H2 complexes were calculated at the M06-2X and MP2 levels of theory, e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other characteristic absorptions in a xenon matrix appear at 755, 688, 642, and 607 cm −1 (756, 688, 644, and 608 cm −1 in a krypton matrix; 756, 689, 647, and 610 cm −1 in an argon matrix), corresponding to the phenyl CH out-of-plane, ≡C–H in-plane, phenyl CH out-of-plane, and ≡C–H out-of-plane bending modes, respectively. These frequencies are in good agreement with the values previously reported for the ≡C–H stretching band (3323.2 and 3310.8/3309.2 cm −1 ) and the phenyl CH out-of-plane bending band (758.7 cm −1 ) in a nitrogen matrix 23, 24 . The splitting of the ≡C–H stretching band was explained by a Fermi resonance between the acetylenic ≡C–H stretching vibration and a combination of one quantum of the C≡C stretching vibration and two quanta of the C≡C–H out-of-plane bending vibration 2527 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other characteristic absorptions in a xenon matrix appear at 755, 688, 642, and 607 cm −1 (756, 688, 644, and 608 cm −1 in a krypton matrix; 756, 689, 647, and 610 cm −1 in an argon matrix), corresponding to the phenyl CH out-of-plane, ≡C–H in-plane, phenyl CH out-of-plane, and ≡C–H out-of-plane bending modes, respectively. These frequencies are in good agreement with the values previously reported for the ≡C–H stretching band (3323.2 and 3310.8/3309.2 cm −1 ) and the phenyl CH out-of-plane bending band (758.7 cm −1 ) in a nitrogen matrix 23, 24 . The splitting of the ≡C–H stretching band was explained by a Fermi resonance between the acetylenic ≡C–H stretching vibration and a combination of one quantum of the C≡C stretching vibration and two quanta of the C≡C–H out-of-plane bending vibration 2527 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, some splitting still occurs in the ≡C–D stretching region (2601.5/2595.0/2592.5 cm −1 ) probably due to different matrix sites. A similar situation occurs in a nitrogen matrix 23, 24 .
Figure 2FTIR spectra of PhAc (upper trace) and PhAc-d 6 (lower trace) in a xenon matrix ( a ). Calculated spectra at the M06-2X/aug-cc-pVTZ level of theory and scaled by a factor of 0.97 ( b ).
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Matrix isolation experiments were performed using a Sumitomo closed cycle helium compressor-cooled cryostat (HC-4E1) to attain a temperature of 12 K. The experimental details have been described elsewhere [17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6. 19 As is evident from the figure, three of these minima show ≡C-H···π contacts, while one structure manifests a π···π interaction. The energy difference between the various isomers is rather minimal.…”
Section: Acetylenic Systemsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Details as to how the scaling factors were computed are discussed in detail in many of our earlier publications. [18][19][20][21] The computed wavenumbers together with the intensities of the various vibrational modes were used to simulate a vibrational spectrum using the SYNSPEC program, 22 assuming a Lorentzian line profile with a full-width-half-maximum (FWHM) of 1.0 cm −1 .…”
Section: Computationsmentioning
confidence: 99%