2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6cp03980d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogen bond competition in the ethanol–methanol dimer

Abstract: Previous theoretical work on the ethanol-methanol dimer has been inconclusive in predicting the preferred hydrogen bond donor/acceptor configuration. Here, we report the microwave spectrum of the dimer using a chirped pulse Fourier transform microwave spectrometer from 8-18 GHz. In an argon-backed expansion, 50 transitions have been assigned to a trans-ethanol-acceptor/methanol-donor structure that is likely stabilized by a secondary weak C-HO hydrogen bond. A higher energy conformer was observed in a helium-b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(55 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rotational spectrum recorded using Ne as carrier gas (Figure 2, middle) showed a much better signal-to-noise ratio than the one with He but only three conformers, g+g+, g−t, and tt, could be detected. In the Ar jet spectrum only one conformer, homochiral g+g+, was present (Figure 2, bottom), confirming that is the lowest energy form in agreement with results reported by Finneran et al 16 Considering the results above, the conformers g−t and tt detected in a Ne expansion are the next conformers in energy ordering above the global minimum, and the three conformers detected only in He, the higher energy ones. In addition to these observations, we have carried out careful relative intensity measurements of the measured a-type transitions common to all conformations, and corrected them considering that transition intensity is proportional to the square of the corresponding dipole moment component µ a .…”
Section: Conformational Energy Orderingsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The rotational spectrum recorded using Ne as carrier gas (Figure 2, middle) showed a much better signal-to-noise ratio than the one with He but only three conformers, g+g+, g−t, and tt, could be detected. In the Ar jet spectrum only one conformer, homochiral g+g+, was present (Figure 2, bottom), confirming that is the lowest energy form in agreement with results reported by Finneran et al 16 Considering the results above, the conformers g−t and tt detected in a Ne expansion are the next conformers in energy ordering above the global minimum, and the three conformers detected only in He, the higher energy ones. In addition to these observations, we have carried out careful relative intensity measurements of the measured a-type transitions common to all conformations, and corrected them considering that transition intensity is proportional to the square of the corresponding dipole moment component µ a .…”
Section: Conformational Energy Orderingsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, this is not a widespread occurrence. In the ethanol-methanol complex 16 ethanol remains in the trans configuration in the lowest energy conformation, and in complexes of ethanol with other partners (including NH 3 36 , dimethylether 37 , and oxirane derivatives 38,39 ) both gauche and trans ethanol have been found to participate in the lowest-energy form. All ethanol complexes above show several configurations very close in energy, which arise from the ease of ethanol to switch conformations and therefore makes it difficult to predict which conformation will be adopted by ethanol in the global minimum.…”
Section: Conformational Preferences and Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When alcohols form dimers, one moiety acts as proton donor, the other as proton acceptor . In heterodimers, it seems that there is preference for the role of proton donor/acceptor: Only two isomers with ethanol‐acceptor/methanol‐donor structures have been observed, which suggests ethanol‐donor–methanol‐acceptor interactions are energetically disfavored …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%