2010
DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2010-00238-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogen adsorption on graphene: a first principles study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

17
97
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
17
97
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, and in agreement with many previous DFT GGA studies, the barrier between the gas phase and the chemisorbed state is about 200 meV. 16,19,[32][33][34][35] The chemisorption well is 800 meV with a H−C bond length of 1.13 Å and puckering of the top site carbon atom away from the surface by ∼ 0.4 Å. With PBE there is no physisorption state, which is again consistent with previous work and understandable given the lack of a long-range correlation term in GGA exchange-correlation functionals.…”
Section: Hydrogen At Graphenesupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As expected, and in agreement with many previous DFT GGA studies, the barrier between the gas phase and the chemisorbed state is about 200 meV. 16,19,[32][33][34][35] The chemisorption well is 800 meV with a H−C bond length of 1.13 Å and puckering of the top site carbon atom away from the surface by ∼ 0.4 Å. With PBE there is no physisorption state, which is again consistent with previous work and understandable given the lack of a long-range correlation term in GGA exchange-correlation functionals.…”
Section: Hydrogen At Graphenesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This barrier -which includes vdW, ZPE effects, quantum tunneling and finite temperature effects -is approximately half the height of barriers typically predicted for H atom chemisorption at graphene using traditional DFT-GGA methods. 16,19,[32][33][34][35] Although the barrier is substantially reduced the physisorption well remains relatively unperturbed, being a similar depth and shifted towards the gas phase by just ∼ 0.1 Å.…”
Section: Hydrogen At Graphenementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such method led to the binding energy for graphene equal -7.83 eV that is attractive fit to the results received by other authors. [31][32][33] The fit supports our approach.…”
Section: Used Methodssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…9 Similarly, hydrogen storage on graphene, in spite of excellent gravimetric characteristics, will be seriously considered only provided one solves the well-known dilemma encountered in other carbon nanostructures (nanotubes and fullerenes)-that is, reconciling the high storage efficiency (sufficiently strong carbon-hydrogen binding) at room temperature with the reasonable ease of reversible hydrogen charging/discharging. Indeed, the most recent evaluations 21,22 give the potential barrier of ∼1.1 eV for chemisorbed hydrogen dissociation from graphene. With this desorption energy, it is easy to verify that the average lifetime of individual hydrogen atom on graphene at room temperature is less than a week.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%