Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2019
DOI: 10.1002/pola.29398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogel‐coated polyurethane/urea shape memory polymer foams

Abstract: Shape memory polymers (SMPs) are a class of responsive polymers that have attracted attention in designing biomedical devices because of their potential to improve minimally invasive surgeries. Use of porous SMPs in vascular grafts has been proposed because porosity aids in transfer of fluids through the graft and growth of vascular tissue. However, porosity also allows blood to leak through grafts so preclotting the materials is necessary. Here hydrogels have been synthesized from acrylic acid and N‐hydroxyet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Porous polyurethanes are well known for their potential in minimally invasive devices, leveraging shape memory behavior, although there are obvious limitations associated with the pore morphology and size distribution in such structures. [201][202][203][204][205][206][207][208] An exciting recent development in these materials is with reactive inkjet printing of PEG and several diisocyanate species to produce porous polyurethanes, although this method is still limited by uncontrolled porosity as a consequence of possible side reactions of the isocyanate groups that yield carbon dioxide leading to pore formation. 50,52 While this is a promising start to overcoming such limitations in printable materials with advanced properties, there is obviously extensive development still needed, and currently no specific medical applications have been proposed.…”
Section: Polymers For Nerve Tissue Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Porous polyurethanes are well known for their potential in minimally invasive devices, leveraging shape memory behavior, although there are obvious limitations associated with the pore morphology and size distribution in such structures. [201][202][203][204][205][206][207][208] An exciting recent development in these materials is with reactive inkjet printing of PEG and several diisocyanate species to produce porous polyurethanes, although this method is still limited by uncontrolled porosity as a consequence of possible side reactions of the isocyanate groups that yield carbon dioxide leading to pore formation. 50,52 While this is a promising start to overcoming such limitations in printable materials with advanced properties, there is obviously extensive development still needed, and currently no specific medical applications have been proposed.…”
Section: Polymers For Nerve Tissue Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 276 ] Biomaterial fabrication method provides researchers with control of the topography and geometry. [ 316,317 ] Hydrogels derived from synthetic and natural polymers have been studied in a variety of forms including cell‐encapsulating hydrogels, [ 318 ] coatings, [ 319 ] and porous formulations. [ 320 ] A variety of other processing methods can be used to generate a wide‐range of geometries including nonwoven meshes with electrospinning, [ 311 ] porous foams with freeze drying, [ 321 ] salt‐leaching, [ 322 ] and emulsion templating, [ 323 ] and more complex architectures with 3D printing.…”
Section: Integrin‐targeting Biomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, Lee et al (2013) prepared a chitosan-based bioartificial liver chip using the same processing method [135]. On the other hand, Dalton et al (2019) developed PEG shape memory scaffolds for vascular grafts using this technique [136].…”
Section: Comparison and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%