2019
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1820334116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogel-based transparent soils for root phenotyping in vivo

Abstract: Root phenotypes are increasingly explored as predictors of crop performance but are still challenging to characterize. Media that mimic field conditions (e.g., soil, sand) are opaque to most forms of radiation, while transparent media do not provide field-relevant growing conditions and phenotypes. We describe here a "transparent soil" formed by the spherification of hydrogels of biopolymers. It is specifically designed to support root growth in the presence of air, water, and nutrients, and allows the time-re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Roots are challenging to evaluate in the soil and this has been a major reason for the poor attention that they have been paid in breeding programs in the past. Numerous methods of phenotyping have been used, from laboratory-based methods including the use of soil-free media pots, rhizoboxes, hydroponics or semi-hydroponics media combined with high-throughput digital phenotyping or 3D imaging systems (Walter et al, 2015;Voss-Fels et al, 2018;Jia et al, 2019;Ma et al, 2019;Qiao et al, 2019) to field shovelomics (Trachsel et al, 2011). But still all these methods are generally expensive or/and time-consuming, so better and affordable tools to improve analysis of root traits are still needed.…”
Section: Increased Temperature Associated Root Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roots are challenging to evaluate in the soil and this has been a major reason for the poor attention that they have been paid in breeding programs in the past. Numerous methods of phenotyping have been used, from laboratory-based methods including the use of soil-free media pots, rhizoboxes, hydroponics or semi-hydroponics media combined with high-throughput digital phenotyping or 3D imaging systems (Walter et al, 2015;Voss-Fels et al, 2018;Jia et al, 2019;Ma et al, 2019;Qiao et al, 2019) to field shovelomics (Trachsel et al, 2011). But still all these methods are generally expensive or/and time-consuming, so better and affordable tools to improve analysis of root traits are still needed.…”
Section: Increased Temperature Associated Root Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, to better understand how these bacterial strains interact in the soil environment and to rule out that predation is an in vitro artifact, we buried a slide in an artificial soil-like porous environment ( 35 ) inoculated with the two strains and subsequently introduced the predator into the mixture. We observed successful predation when D. discoideum was introduced in artificial soil for individual Pseudomonas and Paenibacillus strains ( SI Appendix , Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was chosen to use Δ L / L 0 because length is the commonly used parameter to display hydrogel size change in prior literature, including in our own work, and it can be easily and intuitively scaled to both Δvolume/volume 0 and Δarea/area 0 . [ 7,41 ] At least three samples were used to generate the mean value and standard deviation for each swelling kinetics curve. The solid curves represented the changes in length with respect to the original side length, and the dotted curves around each solid curve represented the standard deviation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%