Volume 2: Structures, Safety and Reliability 2012
DOI: 10.1115/omae2012-83560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydroelastic Response of a Ship Structural Detail to Seakeeping Loads Using a Top-Down Scheme

Abstract: In order to investigate the local response of a ship structure, it is necessary to transfer the seakeeping loading to a 3DFEM model of the structure. A common approach is to transfer the seakeeping loads calculated by a BEM method to the FEM model. Following the need to take into account the dynamic response of the ship to the wave excitation, some methods based on a modal approach have been recently developed that include the dry structural modes in the hydro-structure coupling procedure and allow to compute … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the fatigue life/damage calculation, very local stress concentrations are needed, and generally they can be calculated by refining the global coarse mesh or using the so called top-down approach. The former approach seems to be impractical leading to excessive number of finite elements, and therefore here, the latter one is used, which implies solving the global coarse mesh FEM problem at first, and applying the coarse mesh displacements at the boundaries of the local fine mesh later [13]. In this way the fine mesh FEM calculations are performed in a second step with the load cases defined by the prescribed displacements from the coarse mesh and by the local pressures and inertia of the fine mesh.…”
Section: Outline Of the Applied Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the fatigue life/damage calculation, very local stress concentrations are needed, and generally they can be calculated by refining the global coarse mesh or using the so called top-down approach. The former approach seems to be impractical leading to excessive number of finite elements, and therefore here, the latter one is used, which implies solving the global coarse mesh FEM problem at first, and applying the coarse mesh displacements at the boundaries of the local fine mesh later [13]. In this way the fine mesh FEM calculations are performed in a second step with the load cases defined by the prescribed displacements from the coarse mesh and by the local pressures and inertia of the fine mesh.…”
Section: Outline Of the Applied Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the fatigue life calculation, very local stress concentrations are needed, and generally they can be calculated by refining the global coarse mesh or using the so called top-down approach. The former approach seems to be impractical leading to excessive number of finite elements, and therefore here, the latter one is used, which implies solving the global coarse mesh FEM problem at first, and applying the coarse mesh displacements at the boundaries of the local fine mesh later [12].…”
Section: Additional Service Features or Additional Class Notation Whimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Special attention should be paid to this issue and the way in which this was done in the hydro-structure tool HOMER is described in [3]. Meanwhile, in order to evaluate the local stress concentration in the particular structural detail, the so called top-down analysis should be used [19]. This means that the global structural response is first calculated on a full coarse mesh ship model and the resulting information (deformations, pressure, inertia…) are transferred to the local structural model which is finally solved using the same numerical FE method as the one used for the global response.…”
Section: Fatigue Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%