2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2010.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydroelastic interaction in panel-water impacts of high-speed craft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They suggest that Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) can possibly be a tool to study these problems, but that a large amount of work is required to validate such models. One of SPH's major advantages is the ease of treating fluids presenting a free surface, together with the possibility to interact with FEM models, while its major limitation is the very expensive computational time due to the high number of particles needed to model the fluid, which limits its application to relatively small two dimensional models [41][42][43][44]. As an example, in [43] 21 millions particles are needed to obtain results similar to Wagner's solution for the water entry of a rigid wedges.…”
Section: Chaptermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They suggest that Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) can possibly be a tool to study these problems, but that a large amount of work is required to validate such models. One of SPH's major advantages is the ease of treating fluids presenting a free surface, together with the possibility to interact with FEM models, while its major limitation is the very expensive computational time due to the high number of particles needed to model the fluid, which limits its application to relatively small two dimensional models [41][42][43][44]. As an example, in [43] 21 millions particles are needed to obtain results similar to Wagner's solution for the water entry of a rigid wedges.…”
Section: Chaptermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stenius et al [6] presented various impact simulations for high-speed crafts with different impact velocities, deadrise angles, boundary conditions, and panel properties. Based on Wagner's theory, Yamada et al [7] validated numerical methods and investigated the two-dimensional (2D) fullscale slamming impact by changing the rigidity of a wedge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydroelastic criterion and methods for characterization have been presented by Faltinsen (1999Faltinsen ( , 2000 and Stenius, Rose´n, and Kuttenkeuler, 2011. The hydroelastic impact event is typically characterized based on a relation between loading Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue No.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…73, 2015 periods and natural periods of vibration of the structure. The method combines computational fluid dynamics with dynamic finite-element techniques to predict the hydroelastic response of a structure in the time domain by Maki et al, 2011, Panciroli, Abrate, and Minak, 2013, Piro and Maki, 2013, and Stenius, Rose´n, and Kuttenkeuler, 2011 In general, the study of flat-plate slamming has important significance and attracts the interest of many researchers. Although analytical, numerical and experimental means have all been used, it still lacks standardized criteria to estimate slamming loads on flat bodies penetrating water surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%