2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamics of vertical subsurface flow constructed wetlands: Tracer tests with rhodamine WT and numerical modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researchers claim that the poor tracer mass recovery and the non-conservative character of RWT does not adversely affect the quality of the tracer test results, especially if the method of moments is used for interpretation [6,8,17]. However, if the results interpretation is based on a simulation method that involves fitting the model curve directly to the tracer test results these discrepancies may be important.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers claim that the poor tracer mass recovery and the non-conservative character of RWT does not adversely affect the quality of the tracer test results, especially if the method of moments is used for interpretation [6,8,17]. However, if the results interpretation is based on a simulation method that involves fitting the model curve directly to the tracer test results these discrepancies may be important.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to these criteria, six models are selected for review: PHWAT (Brovelli et al 2007(Brovelli et al , 2009a, FITOVERT (Giraldi et al 2009(Giraldi et al , 2010, HYDRUS-2D-CW2D (Langergraber and Š imůnek 2005), HYDRUS-2D-CWM1 (Langergraber and Š imůnek 2012), CWM1-RETRASO (Llorens et al 2011a, b), BIO_PORE (Samsó and García 2013a, b) and AQUASIM-CWM1 (Mburu et al 2012). …”
Section: Model Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a general search for the words "constructed wetland model" on common databases of scientific papers brings a limitless number of publications on this topic. Among them, a very general distinction can be made: those focusing on simulation of the hydraulics (Dittmer et al 2005;Fan et al 2008;Galvão et al 2010;Korkusuz et al 2007;Kotti et al 2013), the hydrodynamics and clogging (or any of them individually) Giraldi et al 2009Giraldi et al , 2010Hua et al 2013;Knowles and Davies 2011;Suliman et al 2006) and those focusing on the removal of a specific pollutant or a set of pollutants (which generally also include hydraulic and hydrodynamic models of diverse complexity). Among the latter, the most commonly targeted pollutants are organic compounds (Akratos et al 2008;Henrichs et al 2007;Liolios et al 2012;Toscano et al 2009), nitrogen (Akratos et al 2009;Henrichs et al 2009;Mayo and Bigambo 2005;McBride and Tanner 2000;Meyer et al 2006Meyer et al , 2011Morvannou et al 2013;Moutsopoulos et al 2011;Toscano et al 2009), sulphur (Lloyd et al 2004), phosphorous (Hafner and Jewell 2006), heavy metals and mine drainage (Goulet 2001;Lee and Scholz 2006;Mitsch and Wise 1998), arsenic , pesticides (Krone-Davis et al 2013) and emerging pollutants (Hijosa-Valsero et al 2011).…”
Section: Model Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5). It has been shown that the hydraulic conductivity in wetlands increases with increased particle size, decreases as uniformity of particle size increases, and is more uniform in saturated sands [32][33]. Difference in particle size was discounted as the primary basis for the disparities in SHC because, apart from the fact that each sand batch was highly similar, group EF sand particles were slightly smaller than group BCD [2% more clay, 2.2% more fine sand, 2.6% less medium sand and 2.8% less coarse sand, but the SHC of group BCD was lower than that of group EF.…”
Section: Hydraulic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%