1973
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(73)80052-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamics of non-Newtonian two-phase flow in pipes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an annular flow is often understood through triangular relationship, the empirical relationship among film thickness, pressure drop, and flowrates (Srivastava and Narasimhamurty, 1973;Tyagi and Srivastava, 1976;Xu et al, 2007) has been previously analyzed. Srivastava and his co-worker (Srivastava, 1977;Tyagi and Srivastava, 1976) proposed a non-Newtonian liquid-gas annular flow model to predict liquid holdup and two-phase pressure drop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an annular flow is often understood through triangular relationship, the empirical relationship among film thickness, pressure drop, and flowrates (Srivastava and Narasimhamurty, 1973;Tyagi and Srivastava, 1976;Xu et al, 2007) has been previously analyzed. Srivastava and his co-worker (Srivastava, 1977;Tyagi and Srivastava, 1976) proposed a non-Newtonian liquid-gas annular flow model to predict liquid holdup and two-phase pressure drop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The injection of gas reduced the internal friction in the pipe when conveying the shear-thinning fluid. As a result, the pressure gradient was reduced, and drag reduction was achieved (Srivastava & Narasimhamurty, 1973). These studies indicate that gas-assisted transport can reduce drag under certain conditions, but specific methods have not been proposed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%