2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.05.100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamics and residence time distribution of liquid flow in tubular reactors equipped with screen-type static mixers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
10
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(109 reference statements)
2
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As presented in Figures and , the axial dispersion coefficient increases with the Reynolds number increase (or if the Peclet number would be analyzed it would become evident that the Reynolds number increases when the Peclet number decreases) due to the existence of much more intense turbulence (swirls and vortexes), which supports the mixing in the axial direction. This fact is consistent with the literature report . It also means that for the higher values of velocity, the contribution of axial dispersion phenomenon increases and the system moves away from the plug‐flow.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As presented in Figures and , the axial dispersion coefficient increases with the Reynolds number increase (or if the Peclet number would be analyzed it would become evident that the Reynolds number increases when the Peclet number decreases) due to the existence of much more intense turbulence (swirls and vortexes), which supports the mixing in the axial direction. This fact is consistent with the literature report . It also means that for the higher values of velocity, the contribution of axial dispersion phenomenon increases and the system moves away from the plug‐flow.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…According to the performed RTD analysis, it was proven that static mixers and even a pipe for Re > 100 cannot be described by use of any of the ideal states’ models because their mixing operation characteristics are different. However, due to the literature reports, it was adopted that the considered devices may be successfully modelled as non‐ideal reactors by use of a simple dispersion model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two general types of devices are used to generate (approximately) the ideal case of homogeneous and isotropic turbulence: the flow behind a grid in a channel [32] or the oscillation of one or more grids in a tank [33]. The first experimental system conducted in wind and water tunnels had a mean flow component across the grid.…”
Section: Active Grid Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para determinar las bondades de ajustes de los modelos tradicionales y propuesto, se determinó la desviación media absoluta (DMA%), desviación absoluta máxima que se indica en paréntesis, y la desviación media relativa (DMR%) como medidas del error entre los datos calculados y experimentales (Valderrama y Alvarez, 2005), así como también la sumatoria de los errores al cuadrado (SSE) y raíz del error cuadrático medio (RMSE) usada como bondad de ajuste en la DTR (Zeng et al, 2005;Abou y Azizi, 2015). En la Tabla 1 se presentan las bondades de ajustes de los modelos tradicionales para cada uno de los tiempos de retención y condiciones estudiadas.…”
Section: Ajuste De Los Datos Experimentales a Los Modelos De Dispersiunclassified
“…También se han obtenido buenos ajuste de los datos de DTR con el modelo de Gauss pero el número de dispersión se hace a través de la varianza (Abou y Azizi, 2015), por otro lado el modelo de TS ha presentado buenos ajustes de manera parcial (Chen et al, 2015), esto se debe a la cola alargada que describe la curva de DTR. Si no se consideran las condiciones de borde adecuadas podemos llegar a resultados diferentes tal como ocurrió en un reactor a escala de laboratorio cuando se tomaron condiciones de GDra dadas por Levenspiel, 1999(Lou et al, 2006, obteniendo mayores valores de dispersión al definir condiciones de borde adecuadas (Zeng et al, 2005), del mismo modo que se observó en un estudio a escala real (Avella, 2001;Peña et al, 2006), lo anterior indica que si no encontramos la dispersión del flujo como parámetro de ajuste del modelo podemos llegar a resultados y conclusiones diferentes, es por ello que esta investigación tiene un gran aporte al estudio del tipo de flujo presente en un reactor a través de un modelo de dispersión axial en un sistema de tratamiento de agua residual en reactores de flujo continuo.…”
Section: Ajuste De Los Datos Experimentales a Los Modelos De Dispersiunclassified