2014
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamical simulations of coupled and uncoupled quintessence models – II. Galaxy clusters

Abstract: We study the z = 0 properties of clusters (and large groups) of galaxies within the context of interacting and non-interacting quintessence cosmological models, using a series of adiabatic SPH simulations. Initially, we examine the average properties of groups and clusters, quantifying their differences in ΛCDM, uncoupled Dark Energy (uDE) and coupled Dark Energy (cDE) cosmologies. In particular, we focus upon radial profiles of the gas density, temperature and pressure, and we also investigate how the standar… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simulation-based investigations beyond spin-alignment have also proven useful in drawing distinctions between ΛCDM and alternative models: Carlesi et al (2014a) finds, using hydrodynamical simulations, that a self-interacting quintessence model provides a higher concentration of haloes within the LSS as compared to their fiducial ΛCDM and other cosmologies compared. Carlesi et al (2014b) find a weak coupling between the spin, triaxiality and virialisation and the cosmology dark sector types. Although Elahi et al (2015) shows little to no difference between ΛCDM and the coupled cosmologies judging by the lack of systematic differences between spin parameter and satellite alignment distributions across cosmologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Simulation-based investigations beyond spin-alignment have also proven useful in drawing distinctions between ΛCDM and alternative models: Carlesi et al (2014a) finds, using hydrodynamical simulations, that a self-interacting quintessence model provides a higher concentration of haloes within the LSS as compared to their fiducial ΛCDM and other cosmologies compared. Carlesi et al (2014b) find a weak coupling between the spin, triaxiality and virialisation and the cosmology dark sector types. Although Elahi et al (2015) shows little to no difference between ΛCDM and the coupled cosmologies judging by the lack of systematic differences between spin parameter and satellite alignment distributions across cosmologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…To compute the potential energy, we use weak lensing observational fittings of NFW profiles. These fittings, justified by the observers confidence in their reliability (Okabe et al 2010;Ettori et al 2013), are further vindicated by interacting DE models from simulations (e. g. Baldi et al 2010;Carlesi et al 2014) which all agree with the NFW shape. We want to have all NFW profiles parametrised by M 200 and c. In general, within a radius r ∆ , i.e.…”
Section: Uniforming the Nfw Profilesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…More recently, Carlesi et al. ( 2014a , b ) have employed a specific suite of high-resolution N -body simulations to investigate how some of the above mentioned effects depend on the cosmic environment in which CDM halos reside, showing that most of the characteristic observational features of interacting dark energy are significantly enhanced for halo populations residing in underdense regions of the Universe. Furthermore, Carlesi et al.…”
Section: Part I Dark Energymentioning
confidence: 99%