Computational Fluid Dynamics 2010
DOI: 10.5772/7106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamic Simulation of Cyclone Separators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The abrasive particles were traced in a Lagrangian reference frame as discrete particles. The most eroded part was at the intersection between the hydrocyclone cylindrical and conical body parts, which was in good accordance with the findings of Utikar et al (2010). From a spatial analysis of the erosion rates, one can conclude that increases in the feed velocity, solid concentration, and particle size increased the erosion field at the upper part of the cylindrical body in front of the tangential inlet.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The abrasive particles were traced in a Lagrangian reference frame as discrete particles. The most eroded part was at the intersection between the hydrocyclone cylindrical and conical body parts, which was in good accordance with the findings of Utikar et al (2010). From a spatial analysis of the erosion rates, one can conclude that increases in the feed velocity, solid concentration, and particle size increased the erosion field at the upper part of the cylindrical body in front of the tangential inlet.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…3, assumption of spherical sand particles, and the isothermal assumption of the flow in the hydrocyclone. The most eroded part was at the intersection between the cyclone cylindrical part and the conical part, which was in good agreement with the findings of Utikar et al (2010). At the region close to the underflow discharge, the erosion is quite low although due to the area restriction and rise of the solid concentration, a different outcome could be expected.…”
Section: Erosion Modelingsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The length scale L for the smallest element of our mesh model was set at 2.5 × 10 −5 m. All of these settings resulted in a value of 50 for the / term. According to a conclusion by Utikar et al [29], fluid phase and solid phase could be considered uncoupled if the value of / was less than 100; therefore, only one-way simulation was needed for our problem. Our simulation was done with Fluent software.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With deepened understanding and increases in computational resources, analysis models have expanded in complexity to include higher order discretization schemes and increasingly complex multi-phase models paired with anisotropic turbulence models such as various different Reynolds stress models (RSM) in RANS (Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes) simulations or unsteady RANS and large-eddy simulation (LES). For a more detailed discussion [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%