2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2019.05.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamic shape optimization by high fidelity CFD solver and Gaussian process based response surface method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, any optimization process is based on the relative merits of one configuration with respect to the others, making the absolute accuracy less relevant than the uncertainty of the calculation to drive the process to convergence. A recent paper [39] highlighted exactly this aspect, since it showed for a very similar ship optimization problem that the relative performance differences among several hull shapes remained almost unchanged (at least in terms of their ranking) even if a quite coarse grid is adopted for the analyses. Using the proposed coarse grid, then, is reasonable to be adopted to drive the optimization loop.…”
Section: Flow Solvermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, any optimization process is based on the relative merits of one configuration with respect to the others, making the absolute accuracy less relevant than the uncertainty of the calculation to drive the process to convergence. A recent paper [39] highlighted exactly this aspect, since it showed for a very similar ship optimization problem that the relative performance differences among several hull shapes remained almost unchanged (at least in terms of their ranking) even if a quite coarse grid is adopted for the analyses. Using the proposed coarse grid, then, is reasonable to be adopted to drive the optimization loop.…”
Section: Flow Solvermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 7, for instance, shows possible FFD zones (the blue FF polygons applied to the surface of the hull) encompassing both large portions of the hull as well as local details such as the stern or the bow, realizable with the developed tool; however, rather than modifying directly the points of the subdivision surface, the FFD is applied to its control polygon through which the surface is reconstructed each time. This permits a more reliable and easy handling of the deformation, as presented in [32,39].…”
Section: Surface Definition and Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additive and/or multiplicative correction methods, also known as "bridge functions" [11,12], can be used to build MF metamodels. Several metamodels have been used in the literature with MF data, such as non-intrusive polynomial chaos [13], Gaussian process [14], co-kriging [15] and stochastic radial basis functions [16]. In CFD-based analysis/optimization, different fidelity levels may be obtained by varying the physical model (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Michell's integral and lifting line theory were respectively employed for optimization of the hull-propeller interaction system. Coppedè et al [33] investigated a CAD-based optimization tool for improvement of calm water performance of KCS model. They used FFD method for geometric parametrization and CFD solver for resistance calculation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%