1987
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.58.2102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamic Screening and Diffusion in Entangled Polymer Solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 with the prediction of a renormalization group calculation from [67] shown as the dashed curve thukumar and Edwards [64]. The data reported by Amis et al [38] and the lower molecular weight data reported by Yu et al [60] and Wiltzius et al [61] deviate systematically from those plotted in Fig.…”
Section: (2)mentioning
confidence: 41%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3 with the prediction of a renormalization group calculation from [67] shown as the dashed curve thukumar and Edwards [64]. The data reported by Amis et al [38] and the lower molecular weight data reported by Yu et al [60] and Wiltzius et al [61] deviate systematically from those plotted in Fig.…”
Section: (2)mentioning
confidence: 41%
“…4 shows that plotting ~e/Rh vs. 16/9.Aa.M.C yields a universal curve using the empirical relation Rh = 1.6 x 10-2.M ~ nm [9]. The dotted line is the predicted behavior from a renormalization group theory calculation by Shiwa [67]. Again the calculated prefactor underestimates the experimentally observed concentration dependence.…”
Section: (2)mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To address this possibility, following the work of Schurtenberger and coworkers, we use evidence based upon theoretical and experimental studies of light scattering from semidilute solutions of linear, flexible polymers of known molecular weight (35)(36)(37)(86)(87)(88)(89)(90)(91)(92)(93)(94). In particular, we shall compare our data to the work of Ohta, Oono, and co-workers, who express the degree of overlap or entanglement of such polymers in terms of the quantity X ) 16 / 9 A 2 cM, where we have neglected the polydispersity, which they include.…”
Section: B) Examination Of the First-order Effect Of Intermicellar Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,5 Unfortunately, there is far less unanimity amongst the theoretical estimates of this quantity, which range from 0 to about 1. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] The calculation of k s can be quite involved ͑even at the theta point where excluded volume interactions can be neglected͒, so these disparities are not easily rationalized. 17 What is clear, however, is that the dynamical processes that are responsible for concentration dependence of chain friction are still only poorly understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%