2010
DOI: 10.1134/s0965545x10010025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamic, optical, and electrooptical properties of macromolecules of third-generation cylindrical dendrimers in chloroform and dichloroacetic acid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diffusion coefficients were theoretically calculated from statistical TEM data and compared with the experimental values. Two simple models have been tested, the Perrin theory for ellipsoids (with the retrospective corrections made by Koenig) ,, and the theories for spherocylindrical particles, developed by Norisuye et al and Yoshizaki et al Both models look promising, as they are analytical, do not require time-consuming numerical simulation, and allow describing the dynamics of nanoscale systems of different nature. , The final expressions, given in the Appendix, were algebraically simplified and transformed to a form where length L and aspect ratio p = L / d are the two free parameters which determine the particle shape.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diffusion coefficients were theoretically calculated from statistical TEM data and compared with the experimental values. Two simple models have been tested, the Perrin theory for ellipsoids (with the retrospective corrections made by Koenig) ,, and the theories for spherocylindrical particles, developed by Norisuye et al and Yoshizaki et al Both models look promising, as they are analytical, do not require time-consuming numerical simulation, and allow describing the dynamics of nanoscale systems of different nature. , The final expressions, given in the Appendix, were algebraically simplified and transformed to a form where length L and aspect ratio p = L / d are the two free parameters which determine the particle shape.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting to compare the macromolecular size of different comb‐like polymers studied earlier: poly(lauryl methacrylate),5 graft polystyrene,77 graft copolymers of poly(methyl methacrylate) and polystyrene,8, 9 graft polymers resulting from the reaction of the poly( m ‐halomethylstyrene) backbone with polystyrene,78 poly( n ‐alkyl methacrylates),11 poly(fluoroalkyl methacrylate)s,79 poly[ N ‐octadecylmaleimide],75 polystyrene macromonomers,80 poly( ω ‐norbornenylpolystyrene) polymacromonomers,81 cylindrical dendrimers based on L ‐aspartic acid,82, 83 arborescent graft polybutadienes,84 and PHPhEPhM studied in this paper. For this purpose, the approach proposed earlier85 can be used, which does not require a priori knowledge of any hydrodynamic parameters and deals only with the experimental values (molar mass and intrinsic viscosity).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Double logarithmic plot of the dependence of [ η ] M on M , for different polymer systems, a: extra‐rigid polymers, b: flexible chain in thermodynamically good solvents, c: globular and short‐highly branched polymer systems. The points are the experimental data obtained for different brush‐like macromolecules, 1: PHPhEPhM (data from Table 2 of this paper), 2: copolymers of poly(methyl methacrylate) and polystyrene,8 3: poly(docosyl methacrylate)s,10 4–6: poly( ω ‐norbornenylpolystyrene) polymacromonomers,81 7: polystyrene macromonomers,78 8: poly(fluoroalkyl methacrylate),79 9: poly(lauryl methacrylate),5 10: graft polymers resulting from the reaction of the poly(m‐halomethylstyrene) backbone with the polystyryllithiums,80 11: poly[ N ‐octadecylmaleimide],75 12: graft polystyrene,77 13,14: cylindrical dendrimers based on L ‐aspartic acid,82, 83 and 15: arborescent graft polybutadienes 84…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%