1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf02099130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamic limit for attractive particle systems on 417-1417-1417-1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
216
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(221 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
216
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We follow the scheme of [39] by deriving a mv version of entropy inequality (9) for the particle system, and using uniqueness results of Theorems 2.1 and 2.3. The key novelty is to obtain the boundary term of [46] from a proper coupling of open systems.…”
Section: Proofs Of Theorems 22 and 24mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We follow the scheme of [39] by deriving a mv version of entropy inequality (9) for the particle system, and using uniqueness results of Theorems 2.1 and 2.3. The key novelty is to obtain the boundary term of [46] from a proper coupling of open systems.…”
Section: Proofs Of Theorems 22 and 24mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To deduce convergence of the empirical measure is a standard technical step (see e.g. [39,22]). Similarly, Corollary 3.1 combined with Theorem 2.3 implies Theorem 2.4.…”
Section: Average Entropy Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since [3,18], it is known that the empirical measures (see Section 2.2) associated to these processes, converge (in probability) to a deterministic measure whose density is the unique entropy solution of a hyperbolic conservation law with concave flux as given in (2.3). The hydrodynamic limit for these processes was set under two different approaches: for both processes in [18] using the Entropy method and for a general set of initial measures associated to a profile; and for the asep in [12] using the Relative Entropy method, under a more restrictive set of initial measures. We notice that it is not difficult to show the hydrodynamic limit for the azrp invoking the same arguments as in [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%