2007
DOI: 10.1002/jps.20818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamic Investigation of USP Dissolution Test Apparatus II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
120
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
13
120
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the tests performed at pH 7.4, somewhat higher fluctuations with values of ΔpH ranging from −0.03 up to −0.04 pH units were noticed immediately after purging. The observed "overregulation" is related to the slower reaction rate of CO 2 (gas) dissolution and dissociation as well as to test parameters, such as the amount of titer gas remaining in the tubing that connects the proportional valve with the diffuser, the electrode response and the mixing conditions in the USP Apparatus II (16)(17)(18)(19). However, both the dynamics and the precision of the pH adjustment can be regulated flexibly by appropriately setting the pressure of the titer gas introduced into the device as well as by the adjusting the device settings such as trigger pH difference, regulation range, and hysteresis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the tests performed at pH 7.4, somewhat higher fluctuations with values of ΔpH ranging from −0.03 up to −0.04 pH units were noticed immediately after purging. The observed "overregulation" is related to the slower reaction rate of CO 2 (gas) dissolution and dissociation as well as to test parameters, such as the amount of titer gas remaining in the tubing that connects the proportional valve with the diffuser, the electrode response and the mixing conditions in the USP Apparatus II (16)(17)(18)(19). However, both the dynamics and the precision of the pH adjustment can be regulated flexibly by appropriately setting the pressure of the titer gas introduced into the device as well as by the adjusting the device settings such as trigger pH difference, regulation range, and hysteresis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recirculation loop described in the lower part of the vessel may not penetrate the very low velocity region at the center of the vessel base (26), which explains this frequently observed coning phenomenon. It is possible to predict the minimum rotation speed at which the cone will disappear based on an application of the Zwietering equation (32,33).…”
Section: Coningmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Recirculation loops have been identified in both the upper and lower sections of the vessel, with a weak positive axial flow under the impeller in the center of lower part of the vessel. Overall fluid velocity values and shear rates in the vessel base are very low, especially at the center of the vessel base compared to other regions of the vessel (13,21,(24)(25)(26)(27).…”
Section: General Flow Featuresmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, and to make the system more sensitive to the effect of small geometric differences, tests were also conducted with tablets fixed at several positions in the vessel. As shown in previous studies by this group (25)(26)(27), tablets placed at different locations on the vessel bottom can have different dissolution rates since they experience different flows around them and different shear stresses, especially if the system is nonsymmetrical. Therefore, in this work, dissolution tests were conducted not only with the standard tablet drop technique specified in the USP (28), but also with tablets fixed in place at nine positions on the vessel bottom (i.e., the central position, four positions on the 10° off-center circle, and four other positions on the 20° off-center circle).…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%