2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamic Effects on Biofilms at the Biointerface Using a Microfluidic Electrochemical Cell: Case Study of Pseudomonas sp.

Abstract: The anchoring biofilm layer is expected to exhibit a different response to environmental stresses than for portions in the bulk, due to the protection from other strata and the proximity to the attachment surface. The effect of hydrodynamic stress on surface-adhered biofilm layers was tested using a specially designed microfluidic bio flow cell with an embedded three-electrode detection system. In situ electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements of biocapacitance and bioresistance of Pseudomonas … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
46
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Byproducts from half‐cell reactions at the WE and the counter electrode (CE) were carried downstream and did not contaminate the liquid environment around the RE because the upstream diffusion of H + was slower than the downstream convection (see Table S1 for mass transfer calculation results). The electrode configuration which placed the RE upstream were it could be exposed to a constant flux of fresh nutrient media has been shown previously as a method for achieving stable performance from an Au pseudo RE for non‐electroactive bacteria and their biofilms ,. For electroactive biofilms used here, stability was enhanced because G. sulfurreducens bacteria could not complete the Krebs cycles via electrode respiration at the RE because no current is permitted to flow through it.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Byproducts from half‐cell reactions at the WE and the counter electrode (CE) were carried downstream and did not contaminate the liquid environment around the RE because the upstream diffusion of H + was slower than the downstream convection (see Table S1 for mass transfer calculation results). The electrode configuration which placed the RE upstream were it could be exposed to a constant flux of fresh nutrient media has been shown previously as a method for achieving stable performance from an Au pseudo RE for non‐electroactive bacteria and their biofilms ,. For electroactive biofilms used here, stability was enhanced because G. sulfurreducens bacteria could not complete the Krebs cycles via electrode respiration at the RE because no current is permitted to flow through it.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…To better understand how the bulk flow of a typical Ac‐based nutrient solution affects the pH b of a G. sulfurreducens biofilm, a three‐electrode microfluidic system was used. The reader is directed to previous work that discusses the fabrication protocol to insert the electrodes flush against the microchannel wall in a similar device used for electrochemical impedance spectroscopy of non‐electroactive biofilms . Figure a shows the device schematic, including placement of electrodes and direction of liquid flow.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The channel-embedded electrodes were fabricated as shown previously. [26,30] Graphite was used for both the working (WE) and counter (CE) electrodes and a stable gold (Au) pseudo reference electrode (RE). The device was operated in an anaerobic enclosure with controlled temperature of 23 � 0.5°C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frozen samples of Geobacter sulfurreducens (strain PCA, ATCC 51573), were cultured under controlled temperature and deoxygenated conditions before being injected into the microfluidic electrochemical device. The channel‐embedded electrodes were fabricated as shown previously ,. Graphite was used for both the working (WE) and counter (CE) electrodes and a stable gold (Au) pseudo reference electrode (RE).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%