1982
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(82)80024-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamic effects in trickle bed laboratory reactors for hydrodesulphurization and hydrodemetallization of heavy feeds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above results indicate that if a diluent size of 0.19 mm or smaller is used, it could eliminate the shortcomings of a microreactor for testing catalyst in commercially applied shape and process conditions. It has been established by previous researchers that use of 0.2−0.5 mm of diluent can remove all the limitations of a bench scale unit in testing commercial shaped catalyst. , Thus, the results obtained from the bench scale reactor containing 100 mL of catalyst and diluted with 0.19 mm of particles were considered as the reference data for gauging the performance of the microreactor. The performances of the microreactor using 5 mL of commercial catalyst and diluent of 0.19 mm size were compared with those obtained from a bench scale unit using 100 mL of catalyst.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The above results indicate that if a diluent size of 0.19 mm or smaller is used, it could eliminate the shortcomings of a microreactor for testing catalyst in commercially applied shape and process conditions. It has been established by previous researchers that use of 0.2−0.5 mm of diluent can remove all the limitations of a bench scale unit in testing commercial shaped catalyst. , Thus, the results obtained from the bench scale reactor containing 100 mL of catalyst and diluted with 0.19 mm of particles were considered as the reference data for gauging the performance of the microreactor. The performances of the microreactor using 5 mL of commercial catalyst and diluent of 0.19 mm size were compared with those obtained from a bench scale unit using 100 mL of catalyst.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effective solution that is recommended and widely accepted to handle the problem in testing commercial catalyst in small-scale reactors, is to use the catalyst in original form but diluted with nonporous, inert particles or fines. A number of researchers have studied on the use of fine diluent in small-scale reactors and have attempted to overcome these drawbacks. However, most of these studies have been restricted to bench scale reactors where about 50−100 mL of catalysts were used. Only few studies are available providing information on the effect of diluent size on a microreactor performance while testing as low as 5 mL of catalyst of commercially applied size and shape .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various researchers have studied the use of diluents in small reactors and they have attemped to overcome these problems. However, most of these studies have been restricted to bench scale reactors where about 50−100 mL of catalysts were used. The problem with these systems is that new catalyst formulations are not available in large quantity, and the amount of catalyst involved in experimental tests must be small .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%