Abstract:Harbour seals are known to be opportunistic feeders, whose diet consists mainly of pelagic and benthic fish, such as flatfish. As flatfish are often cryptic and do not produce noise, we hypothesized that harbour seals are able to detect and localize flatfish using their hydrodynamic sensory system (vibrissae), as fish emit water currents through their gill openings (breathing currents). To test this hypothesis, we created an experimental platform where an artificial breathing current was emitted through one of… Show more
“…This study highlights how a behavioral approach can address questions about tactile cues relevant for prey capture in the wild. For example, this study focused on active touch, yet sea otters may use hydrodynamic information while foraging for burrowed invertebrates, similar to harbor seals' ability to detect simulated benthic flatfish breathing currents (Niesterok et al, 2017). Although sea otter vibrissae seem morphologically adapted to active touch rather than passive touch required for hydrodynamic detection, this may not preclude sea otters from detecting water currents emitted by prey as a byproduct of respiration.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both passive and active hearing may assist in prey detection, but at close range, taction has emerged as a primary sense among aquatic and semiaquatic taxa, especially when hunting buried invertebrates or fishes (Dehnhardt and Mauck, 2008). For example, many shorebird species probe the tidally flooded substrate with touch structures at their beak tips (Piersma et al, 1998); star-nosed moles seek prey in subterranean streams using specialized appendages around their nostrils (Catania and Kaas, 1997;Catania and Remple, 2004); and seals, sea lions and walruses detect and pursue prey using their vibrissae while diving (Dehnhardt and Mauck, 2008;Dehnhardt et al, 2001;Kastelein and van Gaalen, 1988;Kastelein et al, 1990;Niesterok et al, 2017).…”
Sea otters () are marine predators that forage on a wide array of cryptic, benthic invertebrates. Observational studies and anatomical investigations of the sea otter somatosensory cortex suggest that touch is an important sense for detecting and capturing prey. Sea otters have two well-developed tactile structures: front paws and facial vibrissae. In this study, we use a two-alternative forced choice paradigm to investigate tactile sensitivity of a sea otter subject's paws and vibrissae, both in air and under water. We corroborate these measurements by testing human subjects with the same experimental paradigm. The sea otter showed good sensitivity with both tactile structures, but better paw sensitivity (Weber fraction, =0.14) than vibrissal sensitivity (=0.24). The sea otter's sensitivity was similar in air and under water for paw (=0.12, =0.15) and for vibrissae (=0.24, =0.25). Relative to the human subjects we tested, the sea otter achieved similar sensitivity when using her paw and responded approximately 30-fold faster regardless of difficulty level. Relative to non-human mammalian tactile specialists, the sea otter achieved similar or better sensitivity when using either her paw or vibrissae and responded 1.5- to 15-fold faster near threshold. Our findings suggest that sea otters have sensitive, rapid tactile processing capabilities. This functional test of anatomy-based hypotheses provides a mechanistic framework to interpret adaptations and behavioral strategies used by predators to detect and capture cryptic prey in aquatic habitats.
“…This study highlights how a behavioral approach can address questions about tactile cues relevant for prey capture in the wild. For example, this study focused on active touch, yet sea otters may use hydrodynamic information while foraging for burrowed invertebrates, similar to harbor seals' ability to detect simulated benthic flatfish breathing currents (Niesterok et al, 2017). Although sea otter vibrissae seem morphologically adapted to active touch rather than passive touch required for hydrodynamic detection, this may not preclude sea otters from detecting water currents emitted by prey as a byproduct of respiration.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both passive and active hearing may assist in prey detection, but at close range, taction has emerged as a primary sense among aquatic and semiaquatic taxa, especially when hunting buried invertebrates or fishes (Dehnhardt and Mauck, 2008). For example, many shorebird species probe the tidally flooded substrate with touch structures at their beak tips (Piersma et al, 1998); star-nosed moles seek prey in subterranean streams using specialized appendages around their nostrils (Catania and Kaas, 1997;Catania and Remple, 2004); and seals, sea lions and walruses detect and pursue prey using their vibrissae while diving (Dehnhardt and Mauck, 2008;Dehnhardt et al, 2001;Kastelein and van Gaalen, 1988;Kastelein et al, 1990;Niesterok et al, 2017).…”
Sea otters () are marine predators that forage on a wide array of cryptic, benthic invertebrates. Observational studies and anatomical investigations of the sea otter somatosensory cortex suggest that touch is an important sense for detecting and capturing prey. Sea otters have two well-developed tactile structures: front paws and facial vibrissae. In this study, we use a two-alternative forced choice paradigm to investigate tactile sensitivity of a sea otter subject's paws and vibrissae, both in air and under water. We corroborate these measurements by testing human subjects with the same experimental paradigm. The sea otter showed good sensitivity with both tactile structures, but better paw sensitivity (Weber fraction, =0.14) than vibrissal sensitivity (=0.24). The sea otter's sensitivity was similar in air and under water for paw (=0.12, =0.15) and for vibrissae (=0.24, =0.25). Relative to the human subjects we tested, the sea otter achieved similar sensitivity when using her paw and responded approximately 30-fold faster regardless of difficulty level. Relative to non-human mammalian tactile specialists, the sea otter achieved similar or better sensitivity when using either her paw or vibrissae and responded 1.5- to 15-fold faster near threshold. Our findings suggest that sea otters have sensitive, rapid tactile processing capabilities. This functional test of anatomy-based hypotheses provides a mechanistic framework to interpret adaptations and behavioral strategies used by predators to detect and capture cryptic prey in aquatic habitats.
“…This study was conducted with two male harbour seals (Phoca vitulina Linnaeus 1758), Henry and Luca, which had also participated in our former experiment on the detection of artificial flatfish breathing currents (Niesterok et al, 2017). They were 19 years (Henry) and 13 years (Luca) old.…”
Section: Materials and Methods Experimental Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the opening of the nozzles was just below the mesh wire grid in our previous study (Niesterok et al, 2017), for this experiment the openings of the nozzles were lowered (Fig. 1B) by 23 cm vertically, to imitate another potential situation in the wild: a seal swimming over the ground at some distance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous study (Niesterok et al, 2017), we demonstrated a harbour seal's ability to detect artificial breathing currents using its vibrissae under the influence of hydrodynamic background noise and self-motion. Here, we used artificial flatfish breathing currents to investigate the efficiency of the vibrissal system in terms of a threshold for this specific hydrodynamic stimulus under the influence of self-motion and background noise.…”
Harbour seals have the ability to detect benthic fish such as flatfish using the water currents these fish emit through their gills (breathing currents). We investigated the sensory threshold in harbour seals for this specific hydrodynamic stimulus under conditions which are realistic for seals hunting in the wild. We used an experimental platform where an artificial breathing current was emitted through one of eight different nozzles. Two seals were trained to search for the active nozzle. Each experimental session consisted of eight test trials of a particular stimulus intensity and 16 supra-threshold trials of high stimulus intensity. Test trials were conducted with the animals blindfolded. To determine the threshold, a series of breathing currents differing in intensity was used. For each intensity, three sessions were run. The threshold in terms of maximum water velocity within the breathing current was 4.2 cm s for one seal and 3.7 cm s for the other. We measured background flow velocities from 1.8 to 3.4 cm s Typical swimming speeds for both animals were around 0.5 m s Swimming speed differed between successful and unsuccessful trials. It appears that swimming speed is restricted for the successful detection of a breathing current close to the threshold. Our study is the first to assess a sensory threshold of the vibrissal system for a moving harbour seal under near-natural conditions. Furthermore, this threshold was defined for a natural type of stimulus differing from classical dipole stimuli which have been widely used in threshold determination so far.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.