1999
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.60.16176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamic approximation for the nonlinear response of a metal surface

Abstract: We present semi-classical and quantized hydrodynamic models to obtain the quadratic electronic response of a plane-bounded electron gas. Explicit expressions for the dynamic image potential experienced by charged particles moving near a jellium surface are derived, up to third order in the projectile charge. These expressions are employed to compute the image potential at all distances outside the surface. Though nonlinear corrections are found to be more important far inside the solid than outside, our result… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(8) and (9) in the Heisenberg picture. Our results [23] reproduce previous calculations for the image potential [defined as half the induced potential at the position of the charged particle that creates it] of a static (v = 0) external charged particle [5], which in the case of a non-dispersive electron gas (β = 0) coincides with the classical image potential [24] V im (z) = −(4z) −1 . The energy loss per unit path length of a moving charged particle can be obtained as the retarding force that the polarization charge distribution in the electron gas exerts on the projectile itself [25]:…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…(8) and (9) in the Heisenberg picture. Our results [23] reproduce previous calculations for the image potential [defined as half the induced potential at the position of the charged particle that creates it] of a static (v = 0) external charged particle [5], which in the case of a non-dispersive electron gas (β = 0) coincides with the classical image potential [24] V im (z) = −(4z) −1 . The energy loss per unit path length of a moving charged particle can be obtained as the retarding force that the polarization charge distribution in the electron gas exerts on the projectile itself [25]:…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Our derivation of the quantized SPP Hamiltonian H SPP and its coupling to electrons H SPP-el follows the procedure used in Ref. 80, in which the SPPs are obtained from quantization of the classical plasmon field. The classical plasmon field is derived within the hydrodynamical model, which treats plasmons as irrotational deformations of the conduction electrons.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these corrections have been shown to be less important when the charged particle moves outside the solid [56]. Hence, in the case of a bounded three-dimensional electron gas we restrict the calculations to linear-response theory.…”
Section: Bounded Electron Gasmentioning
confidence: 99%