1978
DOI: 10.1021/ma60062a003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamic and Optical Properties of Homologous Series of Styrene-Methyl Methacrylate Graft Copolymers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thermodynamic quality of the solvent may change on passing from one generation to another, and the h conditions not will be the same for the different generations likes the behaviour of short- (Figs. 2, 3) branched comblike molecules and star molecules [51][52][53]. The contributions of these effects can change depending on the number of end groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The thermodynamic quality of the solvent may change on passing from one generation to another, and the h conditions not will be the same for the different generations likes the behaviour of short- (Figs. 2, 3) branched comblike molecules and star molecules [51][52][53]. The contributions of these effects can change depending on the number of end groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The dependence of the Huggins parameter k¢ on the number of end groups in DAB dendrimers: 1 DAB-dend-(CN) x , 2 DAB-dend-(C15) x , 3 DAB-dend-(lacto) x [29,30] dendron (L ¼ 25 · 10 )8 cm) comparable with the Kuhn segment length. It is necessary to take into account a possible increase in the equilibrium rigidity, A, caused by the interaction between side chains [8,29,53] in the dendron and by electrostatic interaction [55], which can lead to l/A ( 1. This implies that the increase in the hybrid dendrimer size due to core swelling is unlikely and that to a first approximation all changes can be considered to be caused by the contribution of end groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting to compare the macromolecular size of different comb‐like polymers studied earlier: poly(lauryl methacrylate),5 graft polystyrene,77 graft copolymers of poly(methyl methacrylate) and polystyrene,8, 9 graft polymers resulting from the reaction of the poly( m ‐halomethylstyrene) backbone with polystyrene,78 poly( n ‐alkyl methacrylates),11 poly(fluoroalkyl methacrylate)s,79 poly[ N ‐octadecylmaleimide],75 polystyrene macromonomers,80 poly( ω ‐norbornenylpolystyrene) polymacromonomers,81 cylindrical dendrimers based on L ‐aspartic acid,82, 83 arborescent graft polybutadienes,84 and PHPhEPhM studied in this paper. For this purpose, the approach proposed earlier85 can be used, which does not require a priori knowledge of any hydrodynamic parameters and deals only with the experimental values (molar mass and intrinsic viscosity).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are different classes of brush‐like (comb‐like) macromolecules, for instance: (1) macromolecules having non‐interacting side‐groups, such as graft copolymers of poly(methyl methacrylate) and polystyrene, alkyl acrylates or alkyl methacrylates,5–10 (2) macromolecules having side groups, which can specifically interact, in particular side groups containing the mesogenic fragments or liquid‐crystal fragments,11–13 and (3) proteoglycans, which are brush‐like biomacromolecular systems with very dense packing of the side chains 14–16…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation