2010
DOI: 10.1016/s1001-6058(09)60041-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamic and Elastohydrodynamic Studies of a Cylindrical Journal Bearing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Attia et al. 28 studied the hydrodynamic simulation model considering the elastic deformation of the bearing. Their study clearly demonstrated that the deformation in bearing affects the pressure field in the clearance and increases the fluid film thickness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attia et al. 28 studied the hydrodynamic simulation model considering the elastic deformation of the bearing. Their study clearly demonstrated that the deformation in bearing affects the pressure field in the clearance and increases the fluid film thickness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the concrete application, deformation can have positive as well as negative impact on the load-carrying capacity of sliding bearings. If elasto-hydrodynamic deformation is dominant, a rise of the film thickness compared to the hydrodynamic theory exists [9]. Conversely, Hagemann et al [10] show a reduction of film thickness for a large five-pad tilting-pad journal bearing due to consideration of thermo-mechanical deformation in their analysis and validate the results with experimental data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, the eccentricity of axial forces causes a moment load Msc that has to be restored by the bearing. This moment load follows according to Equation (9).…”
Section: Bearing Loads Due To Mesh Forcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are different methods to obtain the bearing coefficients,such as, experimental (Tiwari et al 2004, Mao et al 2016analytical (Chasalevris andSfyris, Wang andKhonsari 2006, Miraskari et al 2018a), finite difference method(FDM) (Gero and McC. Ettles 1986, Qiu and Tieu 1995, Goodwin et al 1997, finite element method (FEM) (Wada et al 1971, Mourelatos 1985, Arregui and Vázquez 2001, Nair and Nair 2004, Awasthi et al 2006, Hili et al 2010 , mesh less method with radial basis (MMRB) (Nicoletti 2013) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) (Gao et al 2014, Zhang et al 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%