2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2005.07.185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydroconversion of Fischer–Tropsch waxes: Assessment of the operating conditions effect by factorial design experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Calemma et al [6] reported the strong impact of temperature and hydrogen/feedstock ratio on the vapor/liquid ratio and phase composition in mild hydrocracking of FT waxes. From Table 4, it clearly appears that under typical process conditions the liquid phase is enriched in heavier C 22+ paraffins compared to the feedstock.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calemma et al [6] reported the strong impact of temperature and hydrogen/feedstock ratio on the vapor/liquid ratio and phase composition in mild hydrocracking of FT waxes. From Table 4, it clearly appears that under typical process conditions the liquid phase is enriched in heavier C 22+ paraffins compared to the feedstock.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of operating conditions-temperature, pressure, H 2 /waxes ratio and weight hourly space velocity (WHSV)-was investigated by a second order factorial design, the so called central composite design (CCD) (Calemma et al, 2005a). Experiments carried out according to a factorial design allow to esteem in the most correct way the influence of each single factor (i.e., temperature, WHSV, pressure and H 2 /waxes) on the response (i.e., conversion, isomer concentration, etc.)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selective hydrocracking of F-T waxes to dieselranged hydrocarbons (C 11 -C 20 ) is considerably more difficult than the selective hydrocracking of F-T waxes to gasoline-ranged hydrocarbons (C 5 -C 10 ) due to the further cracking of C 11 -C 20 hydrocarbons. In Table 4, we compared the catalytic performances of Pt/Al 13 -Mont and Pt/ Zr 4 -Mont with those of Pt/Al 2 O 3 -SiO 2 and Pt/WO 3 /ZrO 2 because the latter are reportedly effective catalysts for the selective hydrocracking of F-T waxes to diesel-ranged hydrocarbons [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Pt/Al 13 -Mont showed the lowest conversion (77.2%) and the highest selectivity for dieselranged C 11 -C 20 hydrocarbons (84.2%) among the various catalysts.…”
Section: Hydrocracking Of N-c 36 H 74 Over Various Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), the hydrocracking of F-T waxes to middle-distillate hydrocarbons (C 11 -C 20 ) is very attractive for producing diesel fuel with a high cetane number [5]. Although Pt and Ni have been used as metal catalysts in bifunctional catalysts for the hydrocracking of F-T waxes, Pt-based catalysts usually exhibit higher catalytic performance than Ni-based ones because F-T waxes do not have sulfur-containing compounds [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Pt/WO 3 /ZrO 2 and Pt/ Al 2 O 3 -SiO 2 have been reported to be effective catalysts for the hydrocracking of F-T waxes to diesel-ranged hydrocarbons [7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%