2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrochar production from watermelon peel by hydrothermal carbonization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
50
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
5
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pala et al [14] compared the HTC and torrefaction of grape pomace (GP) and found that in comparison to torrefaction, HTC results in products with higher energy density, energy yield, fragility, and combustion reactivity. Their results also indicated that the mass yield for HTC experiments was almost equal for 175 • C, 200 • C, and 225 • C. Watermelon peels and orange peels were hydrothermally carbonized in studies by Chen et al [15] and Fernandez et al [16], respectively. Likewise, the HTC of tomato peels was investigated by Sabio et al [17] who showed that while the time and the temperature of the process have significant effects on the mass yield and energy densification ratio, the water to biomass ratio has a minor effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Pala et al [14] compared the HTC and torrefaction of grape pomace (GP) and found that in comparison to torrefaction, HTC results in products with higher energy density, energy yield, fragility, and combustion reactivity. Their results also indicated that the mass yield for HTC experiments was almost equal for 175 • C, 200 • C, and 225 • C. Watermelon peels and orange peels were hydrothermally carbonized in studies by Chen et al [15] and Fernandez et al [16], respectively. Likewise, the HTC of tomato peels was investigated by Sabio et al [17] who showed that while the time and the temperature of the process have significant effects on the mass yield and energy densification ratio, the water to biomass ratio has a minor effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The measured electrical conductivity of PBM-ETPSH (6.99 dS m −1 ) was more than its precursor PBM-ETPS (5.36 dS m −1 ). The increased electrical conductivity was due to the adsorption of dissociated salts from the raw material during hydrothermal carbonization 16 . The lead content of the PBM-ETPS diminished after hydrothermal carbonization from 82 mg kg −1 to below detection limit in PBM-ETPSH which might be due to the leaching of lead from solid to liquid portions.…”
Section: Characterization Of Pbm-etps and Pbm-etpsh The Ph And Electmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The carbonates, phosphates, and oxides in biochar can result in the precipitation of heavy metals, which enhances the relative fractions of heavy metals in the biochar-added soil [48]. The different functional groups, for instance, carboxyls, phenolics, and hydroxyls, on the surface of porous biochar can adsorb heavy metals through coordination and chelation, which explains the improvements in acid-soluble, oxidable heavy metals in the biochar-added soils [43,44,49,50]. The microbial decomposition of biochar may decrease oxidable heavy metals and valence alteration of some heavy metals, for example, Cu, Cr, Mn, and As [51].…”
Section: The Impacts Of Sewage Sludge Biochar Amendment On Soil Heavymentioning
confidence: 99%