2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.01.116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrocarbon saturation in upper Wolfcamp shale formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to show the advantages of particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm, the Levenberg–Marquardt (LM) algorithm is used to inverse parameters for comparison. LM algorithm is a traditional inversion method and is widely used to inverse reservoir parameters (Han & Misra, 2018; Tathed et al., 2018a, 2018b). In this section, we synthesize four permittivity logs and four conductivity logs at four frequencies by assuming reservoir properties close to the Chang 8 member of the Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin, China (Zhao et al., 2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to show the advantages of particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm, the Levenberg–Marquardt (LM) algorithm is used to inverse parameters for comparison. LM algorithm is a traditional inversion method and is widely used to inverse reservoir parameters (Han & Misra, 2018; Tathed et al., 2018a, 2018b). In this section, we synthesize four permittivity logs and four conductivity logs at four frequencies by assuming reservoir properties close to the Chang 8 member of the Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin, China (Zhao et al., 2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For shale oil samples, there is a critical threshold for hydrocarbon molecules to flow, and the volume increase of pores larger than the threshold is conducive to fluid migration. 60,61 The PSD of the Z22-25 sample shows that there are two obvious peaks of pore-fracture generation, one peak (>1 μm) at 200 °C and the other peak (10−100 nm) at 500 °C, after the samples absorb the microwave energy. It is worth noting that the peak (10−100 nm) at 500 °C also appeared in the microwave-treated samples TY1-14 and JY190-15.…”
Section: Effect Of Microwave Treatment Time (Temperature)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another limitation of the conventional method for calculating water saturation is that the resistivity logging tool cannot differentiate water from hydrocarbon when the water is less conductive (or lower salinity). This issue becomes more problematic when we work on unconventional reservoir due to clay bound water (Cho et al [4,5], Kadkhodaie and Rezaee [6], Sotelo et al [7], and Tathed et al [8]). As an alternative, for last decade, the measurement of dielectric permittivity has been gaining attention in the oil and gas industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%