1976
DOI: 10.3133/ofr76449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrocarbon potential, geologic hazards, and infrastructure for exploration and development of the lower Cook Inlet, Alaska

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within these basins, the Cretaceous Matanuska and Kaguyak formations and other unnamed units record dom-inantly marine depositional systems with the majority of sediment input from the adjacent Jurassic-Cretaceous volcano-plutonic belts that represent arc magmatism ( Fig. 14A; Magoon et al, 1976a;Magoon et al, 1976b;Fisher and Magoon, 1978;Detterman and Miller, 1985;Magoon and Egbert, 1986;Trop, 2008). During this time period, the southern Alaska forearc basin system was similar to the models based on the Great Valley sequence (Dickinson and Seely, 1979;Dickinson, 1995;DeGraaff-Surpless et al, 2002) with the bulk of the sediment derived from an adjacent coeval magmatic arc system and deposition in marine settings (Trop, 2008).…”
Section: Late Cretaceous Forearc Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Within these basins, the Cretaceous Matanuska and Kaguyak formations and other unnamed units record dom-inantly marine depositional systems with the majority of sediment input from the adjacent Jurassic-Cretaceous volcano-plutonic belts that represent arc magmatism ( Fig. 14A; Magoon et al, 1976a;Magoon et al, 1976b;Fisher and Magoon, 1978;Detterman and Miller, 1985;Magoon and Egbert, 1986;Trop, 2008). During this time period, the southern Alaska forearc basin system was similar to the models based on the Great Valley sequence (Dickinson and Seely, 1979;Dickinson, 1995;DeGraaff-Surpless et al, 2002) with the bulk of the sediment derived from an adjacent coeval magmatic arc system and deposition in marine settings (Trop, 2008).…”
Section: Late Cretaceous Forearc Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Provenance data from Late Cretaceous strata on the arc margin of the basin indicate dominantly local arc sources prior to ridge subduction, whereas data from middle Eocene strata on the arc margin that postdate ridge subduction suggest sediment sources located north of the present-day Alaska Range inboard of the mostly dormant Late Cretaceous to Paleocene volcanic arc (Figs.14A and 14B; Magoon et al, 1976aMagoon et al, , 1976bFisher and Magoon, 1978;Detterman and Miller, 1985;Magoon and Egbert, 1986). We infer that after passage of the spreading ridge, widespread subsidence of the upper plate occurred due to crustal thinning that resulted from a combination of physical and thermal thinning of the lithosphere (e.g., Cole and Stewart, 2009) as well as denudation of the Late Cretaceous to Paleocene arc associated with isostatic uplift of the upper plate.…”
Section: Paleocene-eocene Spreading-ridge Subductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample symbols denote both the source of the data (by shape) and the depositional age (by color). (Magoon et al, 1976). In the center of the basin, the forearc strata unconformably overlie Mesozoic sedimentary and volcanic rocks (Jones and Silberling, 1979;Magoon and Egbert, 1986).…”
Section: Existing Provenance and Tectonic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Kenai mountains, Castle mountain, and the Bruin Bay fault zones are the major boundary features (Boss et al, 1975). The Outer Continent Shelf area lies between these faults and contains anticlinal structures and faults that may be potential traps for hydrocarbons (Magoon, 1976). Dickinson (1971) described the basin as a trench-arc gap type: a Cenozoic residual forearc basin in a convergent continental margin along the northwest Pacific Rim.…”
Section: Hydrocarbon Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%