2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydro-thermo-mechanical analysis during injection of cold fluid into a geologic formation

Abstract: a b s t r a c tWe conducted in-depth investigations of pore-pressure buildup, temperature, and stress changes under isothermal or nonisothermal injection scenarios, using numerical simulations. The numerical simulation method combines fluid flow, poroelasticity, thermal diffusion, and thermal stress, and is based on the single-phase fluid flow condition. We also examined temporal evolutions of stress states and mobilized friction angles across base, injection zone, and caprock layers for two different stress r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, even though the injection of cold water will give rise to a somewhat different shape of the cooled region due to the buoyancy and the lower thermal conductivity of CO 2 , the effective stress changes will be similar in both cases. This similarity can be seen by comparing the results of Kim & Hosseini () for cold water injection with those of this study. Therefore, the implications of this study on how cooling affects fracture stability, and thus microseismicity, depending on the existing stress regime can be generalized to fluids different from CO 2 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…For instance, even though the injection of cold water will give rise to a somewhat different shape of the cooled region due to the buoyancy and the lower thermal conductivity of CO 2 , the effective stress changes will be similar in both cases. This similarity can be seen by comparing the results of Kim & Hosseini () for cold water injection with those of this study. Therefore, the implications of this study on how cooling affects fracture stability, and thus microseismicity, depending on the existing stress regime can be generalized to fluids different from CO 2 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…All analytical computations and numerical simulations in this manuscript assume isothermal fluid-injection conditions. Poroelastic analyses for nonisothermal conditions can be found elsewhere (e.g., single-phase fluid flow (De Simone et al, 2013;Goodarzi et al, 2010;Kim and Hosseini, 2015;Kim and Hosseini, 2014;Neuzil, 2003); two-phase fluid flow (Preisig and PrĂ©vost, 2011;Vilarrasa et al, 2014;Vilarrasa et al, 2013b)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Injected CO 2 is usually colder than the reservoir. This causes thermal contraction and thermal stress [7,8]. When high pressure CO 2 is injected into the low pressure reservoir, the CO 2 expands, causing further temperature drop due to Joule-Thomson cooling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%