2012
DOI: 10.1029/2011je003939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydraulic modeling of a distributary channel of Athabasca Valles, Mars, using a high‐resolution digital terrain model

Abstract: Estimating magnitudes of flow rates in outflow channels has a central role in developing understanding of the paleohydrology of Mars. The typical approach to flow estimation is to identify geomorphic features, which indicate bankfull levels, and then use a hydraulic model to convert these levels into flow rates. Data constraints have meant that important assumptions about model equations, boundary conditions and parameter values have been necessary. In this paper, we use a high‐resolution digital terrain model… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model of Manga [] produces discharges of 0.5 to 2.5 ×10 6 m 3 /s for Athabasca Valles (Figure d), which corresponds with peak‐discharge estimates of 1–2 ×10 6 m 3 /s based on bankfull discharge [ Burr et al , ]. Improved methods for discharge estimates based on hydrodynamic models using high‐resolution elevation models provide discharges of the same order of magnitude [ McIntyre et al , ]. In his model, Manga [] simulates one large fissure that reaches to the base of a 3 km deep aquifer; in contrast within our model, the fissures are only present in the confining cryosphere on top the aquifer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model of Manga [] produces discharges of 0.5 to 2.5 ×10 6 m 3 /s for Athabasca Valles (Figure d), which corresponds with peak‐discharge estimates of 1–2 ×10 6 m 3 /s based on bankfull discharge [ Burr et al , ]. Improved methods for discharge estimates based on hydrodynamic models using high‐resolution elevation models provide discharges of the same order of magnitude [ McIntyre et al , ]. In his model, Manga [] simulates one large fissure that reaches to the base of a 3 km deep aquifer; in contrast within our model, the fissures are only present in the confining cryosphere on top the aquifer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…On the other hand, discharge estimates based on bankfull channel dimensions [e.g., Burr et al , ] tend to overestimate discharge required as the process of incision is not taken into account (i.e., incised river valleys are never filled to the brim). Discharge estimates based on the late‐stage channels [e.g., Leask et al , ] or hydraulic modeling based on the final morphology [e.g., McIntyre et al , ] may underestimate an early discharge peak that is responsible for a large part of the incision. For rapid incisive events with an early peak discharge, the final valley width (and not channel) may provide a better estimate of the peak discharge [ Marra et al , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paleohydrologists mostly use two methods to infer discharge from canyon observations: (1) they calculate the required flow depth to initiate motion of the observed sediment sizes through a Shields stress criterion [e.g., O'Connor , ; Lamb et al ., , ] or (2) they assume that observed channels or canyons were filled to the brim (brimful assumption) [e.g., Baker and Milton , ; Carr , ; Robinson and Tanaka , ; Komatsu and Baker , ; McIntyre et al ., ]. Initial motion and brimful assumptions provide conservative lower and upper bounds on flow discharge, respectively, constraining its value with an uncertainty of many orders of magnitude.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several estimates have been derived of paleodischarge rates in the tributaries and/or the outlets of Martian paleolakes, valley networks, or outflow channels [e.g., Carr , ; Komar , , ; Goldspiel and Squyres , ; Komatsu and Baker , ; Williams et al , ; Malin and Edgett , ; Burr , ; Wilson et al , ; Howard et al , ; Irwin et al , ; Jaumann et al , ; Kleinhans , ; Andrews‐Hanna and Phillips , ; Keszthelyi et al , ; Leask et al , ; Kraal et al , ; Wilson et al , ; Hoke et al , ; McIntyre et al , ]. Several techniques may be used to reconstruct the water discharge, depth, and velocity in ancient riverbeds and lakes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%