1976
DOI: 10.1130/0016-7606(1976)87<250:hftdtr>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydraulic fracturing to determine the regional in situ stress field, Piceance Basin, Colorado

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
75
0
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
75
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, our apparently large (relative to uEW and up) value of uNS = -3.1 MPa is consistent with the borehole-pillar configuration, and the fact that fractures in the rock have an approximate vertical N-S orientation which would least effect stress in the N-S direction. Note that the measured UNS = -3.1 MPa is in (perhaps fortuitously) close agreement with the value of -3.9 MPa obtained by Bredehoeft et al (1976) for the N20E horizontal component of principal stress. The results of this study are also in qualitative agreement with those of Coates & Ignatieff (1966), who found the maximum principal pillar stress to be horizontal in a number of cases.…”
Section: F I E L D R E S U L T Ssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Thus, our apparently large (relative to uEW and up) value of uNS = -3.1 MPa is consistent with the borehole-pillar configuration, and the fact that fractures in the rock have an approximate vertical N-S orientation which would least effect stress in the N-S direction. Note that the measured UNS = -3.1 MPa is in (perhaps fortuitously) close agreement with the value of -3.9 MPa obtained by Bredehoeft et al (1976) for the N20E horizontal component of principal stress. The results of this study are also in qualitative agreement with those of Coates & Ignatieff (1966), who found the maximum principal pillar stress to be horizontal in a number of cases.…”
Section: F I E L D R E S U L T Ssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…If failure occurs along pre-existing fractures, the surrounding rock can be assumed to have no inherent tensile strength (Bredehoeft et al, 1976). Based on the Mohr-Coulomb criteria for failure, this introduction of tensional stress should produce me chanical failure along an azimuth that corresponds to the direc tion of maximum horizontal principal stress.…”
Section: Consequences Of An Elliptical Boreholementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If, on the other hand, the fracture is mechanically softer than the surrounding rock matrix, the stress tends to be smeared out along the fracture, reducing the stress concentration at the borehole wall. In such case, the minimum tangential stress can no longer be calculated from the solution in Equation (2), and therefore an error is introduced in the estimate of maximum horizontal stress when using Equation (1).…”
Section: Possible Uncertainties Due To the Induced Fracturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimum horizontal stress, σ h is determined from the shut-in pressure; the maximum horizontal stress, σ H , may be evaluated using Bredehoeft's [1] (1) where P r is the reopening pressure and P 0 is the pore pressure in the fracture. This equation is derived from the Kirsch solution for a circular hole subjected to an internal pressure in an isotropic, homogeneous and, linear elastic medium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%