2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.01.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydraulic correction method (HCM) to enhance the efficiency of SRTM DEM in flood modeling

Abstract: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence Newcastle University ePrints-eprint.ncl.ac.uk Chen H, Liang Q, Liu Y, Xie S. Hydraulic correction method (HCM) to enhance the efficiency of SRTM DEM in flood modeling.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
(86 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To tackle this issue, the creation of a new open-access high-accuracy global DEM is being strongly advocated for by the flooding community (e.g., Sampson et al, 2016;Schumann et al, 2014). Moreover, error-corrected versions of the SRTM DEM such as the Australian 1-arc-sec-resolution Hydrologically Enforced DEM Gallant, Wilson, et al, 2011) and the global 3-arc-sec-resolution "Multi-Error-Removed Improved-Terrain DEM (MERIT DEM)" (Yamazaki et al, 2017) have been released, and strategies to enhance the efficiency of DEMs for hydraulic modeling have been proposed (e.g., Baugh et al, 2013;Chen et al, 2018;Hirt, 2018;Jarihani et al, 2015;Mason et al, 2016;O'Loughlin et al, 2016). However, any DEM is inherently affected by errors and uncertainties, especially in highly complex morphological areas.…”
Section: Hydrological Regime Morphological Features and Simulation mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To tackle this issue, the creation of a new open-access high-accuracy global DEM is being strongly advocated for by the flooding community (e.g., Sampson et al, 2016;Schumann et al, 2014). Moreover, error-corrected versions of the SRTM DEM such as the Australian 1-arc-sec-resolution Hydrologically Enforced DEM Gallant, Wilson, et al, 2011) and the global 3-arc-sec-resolution "Multi-Error-Removed Improved-Terrain DEM (MERIT DEM)" (Yamazaki et al, 2017) have been released, and strategies to enhance the efficiency of DEMs for hydraulic modeling have been proposed (e.g., Baugh et al, 2013;Chen et al, 2018;Hirt, 2018;Jarihani et al, 2015;Mason et al, 2016;O'Loughlin et al, 2016). However, any DEM is inherently affected by errors and uncertainties, especially in highly complex morphological areas.…”
Section: Hydrological Regime Morphological Features and Simulation mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Errors are reduced by separating and removing absolute bias, stripe noise, speckle noise and vegetation bias, with the most significant improvements reported in flat regions (Yamazaki et al, 2017). Compared to SRTM, MERIT has fewer artifacts (Hirt, 2018) and a better performance in flood models compared to SRTM (Chen et al, 2018). Whilst a significant improvement on SRTM, MERIT is still fundamentally based on SRTM data and is thus limited by the errors in SRTM.…”
Section: Dem Editingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of hydrodynamics, DEM repair methods are becoming more and more mature. Based on the map of heaven and earth, the paper superimposes the location information of the natural water system on the basis of DEM as the constraint condition for the extraction of watershed features [24][25] . The location information of natural river system is completed by electronic map rasterization, which forms the standardized river channel information.…”
Section: Dem Abnormal Point Correction Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%