2018
DOI: 10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydraulic Conductivity and Diffusivity: Laboratory Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
325
0
25

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 900 publications
(352 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
325
0
25
Order By: Relevance
“…Th e sample type was: (i) disturbed soil sample for chemical analyses prepared by a standard process to air-dried and sieved soil sample of fi ne particles (< 2 mm) (ISO 11464). SOC (soil organic carbon) was determined as C ox (total oxidized carbon in ISO/FDIS 14235), SOM (soil organic matter) was expressed by 1.724 C ox (assumption that SOM contains 58% of organically bound carbon in Nelson, Sommers 1982), fractionation of humic substances (HS) as a ratio of HA:FA (according to the method described in Richter, Hlušek 1999), pH KCl by potentiometry (according to ISO 10390), cation exchange capacity (CEC) and exchangeable cations measured by AAS-Varian240 (according to ISO 13536); (ii) undisturbed soil samples (Kopecký cylinders -volume 100 cm 3 , according to ISO 11508) for determination of physical characteristics of soil: total porosity was expressed from the values of reduced bulk density (Blake, Hartge 1986) and particle density (Danielson, Sutherland 1986), porosity system was defi ned as a sum of capillary (CP), semi-capillary (SP) and gravitational (GP) pores and calculated by the value of suction capacity (Qs) according to the standard ČSN 13040; (iii) Kopecký rings for saturated hydraulic conductivity (K sat ) described by Klute and Dirksen (1986) and determined according to the standard ČSN 721020; (iv) samples for determination of aggregate stability (weight of sample -3 kg) were airdried and sifted through nested sieves (Retch -ISO 3310-1) to particles of 1-2 mm (WSA) and 3-5 mm in size (MWD), WSA method was described by Kemper and Rosenau (1986), MWD method was described by Le Bissonais (1996).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th e sample type was: (i) disturbed soil sample for chemical analyses prepared by a standard process to air-dried and sieved soil sample of fi ne particles (< 2 mm) (ISO 11464). SOC (soil organic carbon) was determined as C ox (total oxidized carbon in ISO/FDIS 14235), SOM (soil organic matter) was expressed by 1.724 C ox (assumption that SOM contains 58% of organically bound carbon in Nelson, Sommers 1982), fractionation of humic substances (HS) as a ratio of HA:FA (according to the method described in Richter, Hlušek 1999), pH KCl by potentiometry (according to ISO 10390), cation exchange capacity (CEC) and exchangeable cations measured by AAS-Varian240 (according to ISO 13536); (ii) undisturbed soil samples (Kopecký cylinders -volume 100 cm 3 , according to ISO 11508) for determination of physical characteristics of soil: total porosity was expressed from the values of reduced bulk density (Blake, Hartge 1986) and particle density (Danielson, Sutherland 1986), porosity system was defi ned as a sum of capillary (CP), semi-capillary (SP) and gravitational (GP) pores and calculated by the value of suction capacity (Qs) according to the standard ČSN 13040; (iii) Kopecký rings for saturated hydraulic conductivity (K sat ) described by Klute and Dirksen (1986) and determined according to the standard ČSN 721020; (iv) samples for determination of aggregate stability (weight of sample -3 kg) were airdried and sifted through nested sieves (Retch -ISO 3310-1) to particles of 1-2 mm (WSA) and 3-5 mm in size (MWD), WSA method was described by Kemper and Rosenau (1986), MWD method was described by Le Bissonais (1996).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transects were set in the north and east axis at 1, 5, 15, 30 m from 10 randomly chosen nodes of the grid. Soil texture was determined using the hydrometer method (Klute and Dirkens, 1986), soil bulk density was measured with the core method (Grossman and Reinsch, 2002) and soil pH and electric conductivity were measured with a pH/EC tester on a soil water extract. Organic carbon was measured using the Walkley-Black method (Walkley and Black, 1934) and the results converted to organic matter by multiplying the carbon percentage by 1.72.…”
Section: Soil Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schematic Position of the sampling points was presented in the studied region (Figure 2). Physical and chemical properties measurements Percent of sand, silt and clay particles was calculated with hydrometric method (Bouyoucos, 1962), bulk density of soil was calculated with sampling cylinder (Klute and Dirksen, 1986), and total porosity of soil samples was calculated with apparent and real specific mass of soil as a follow (Eq. 1):…”
Section: Study Area and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%