2006
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9437(2006)132:6(537)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydraulic Analysis and Direct Design of Multiple Outlets Pipelines Laid on Flat and Sloping Lands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this example, the recent analytical procedure (Yıldırım, 2006) (Hathoot et al, 2000) yields similar results for the pipe size; for design case (a) D ¼ 10.0 mm and for design case (b) D ¼ 13.0 mm for small, medium and large size of emitter barb, respectively. It is evident from the results of three design procedures that considering local energy losses has the effect of increasing the pipe diameter by 30%, decreasing the operating inlet pressure head by 30%, as well as the total energy losses due to increase in pipe size is decreased by 60%.…”
Section: Applications and Verificationmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For this example, the recent analytical procedure (Yıldırım, 2006) (Hathoot et al, 2000) yields similar results for the pipe size; for design case (a) D ¼ 10.0 mm and for design case (b) D ¼ 13.0 mm for small, medium and large size of emitter barb, respectively. It is evident from the results of three design procedures that considering local energy losses has the effect of increasing the pipe diameter by 30%, decreasing the operating inlet pressure head by 30%, as well as the total energy losses due to increase in pipe size is decreased by 60%.…”
Section: Applications and Verificationmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…For the downslope situation, this basic simplification is not valid since the location of the maximum and minimum pressure heads is variable along the line, and depends on the relationship between energy potential due to uniform pipe slope and the pipe friction losses. As a consequence, for the downhill slope case the location of the maximum pressure head is found either at the first outlet near the pipe inlet or at the first outlet from the downstream closed end point, whereas the location of the minimum pressure head can be found at any point along the pipe downstream segment (Yıldırım, 2006).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This approach can be used to calculate flow variation on laterals and submains in trickle or sprinkler irrigation systems without an excessive calculation effort. Yıldırım (2006) presented analytical formulations allowing direct design of the pipe size and length for any desired uniformity level and given design slope for a single multiple-outlet pipeline. Baiamonte, Provenzano, and Rallo (2015) presented an analytical approach to evaluate the optimal length of paired drip laterals for which two distribution pipes extend in opposite directions from a main manifold placed on uniformly sloped ground.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%