1989
DOI: 10.1139/v89-058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydration studies on some polyhydroxy non-electrolytes and non-ionic surfactants

Abstract: The hydration numbers of some polyhydroxy non-electrolytes and polyoxyethylenated non-ionic surfactants have been determined and found to depend considerably on the method used, the general order being conductometry < ultrasonic interferometry < ir, spectrophotometry. PEG and Tx-100 are exceptions to this trend. The results from ultrasonic interferometry study strongly depend on the data treatment. The maximum hydration obtained using the ir method shows fair agreement with recent nmr and low angle light scatt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
19
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(42 reference statements)
5
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subtracting the specific volume of the anhydrous inulin (reciprocal of density, ρ inulin = 1.328 g/ml) from the V h (2.12 ml/g) produced hydration of inulin = 1.37 ml/g. From this, the mole of water bound per mole of O‐atom in the polymer (five O‐atom per repeating unit of inulin) was estimated to be 2.47 mol/mol of O‐atom, which was in agreement with the literature value 53. The V h was estimated without assuming any shape of the polymer.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Subtracting the specific volume of the anhydrous inulin (reciprocal of density, ρ inulin = 1.328 g/ml) from the V h (2.12 ml/g) produced hydration of inulin = 1.37 ml/g. From this, the mole of water bound per mole of O‐atom in the polymer (five O‐atom per repeating unit of inulin) was estimated to be 2.47 mol/mol of O‐atom, which was in agreement with the literature value 53. The V h was estimated without assuming any shape of the polymer.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…From Table 5, it can be observed that DH 0 s more exothermic in mixed DOSS/nonionics (X STO20EO or SMO20EO = 0.05) systems compared to single DOSS system in these oils. The greater solvation of polyoxyethylene head group of STO20EO or SMO20EO (compared to DOSS) [52] may contribute an exothermic share to the overall thermal events, making the resultant enthalpy of water solution more exothermic with mixed DOSS/STO20EO or SMO20EO systems. On the other hand, DOSS/SMO20EO system makes a larger exothermic contribution towards the water dissolution process compared to DOSS/STO20EO systems at comparable conditions.…”
Section: Thermodynamics Of Desolubilization Of Water or Aqueous Nacl In Mixed Reverse Micellar Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the 10 EO groups may form one coil [155], within which water may be caged. The measured molar ratio of bound water to EO group, N W/EO , was 4.42 when the hydrophobic residue was monolaurate, increasing to N W/EO ϭ 6.07 for monostearate and to N W/EO ϭ 8.84 for monooleate [169]. Even if we assume that Brij 97 is not able to form such a definite structure in the four-component system B, the surfactant still has one more way of stabilizing the system that is not applicable to polyethylene oxide.…”
Section: F Alcohol Interaction With Other Constituentsmentioning
confidence: 98%